[DugwayDuke]

“Because Ryan saw to it that both were fully funded in the budget he pushed through a couple of weeks ago.”

So, what would have changed? What would be different? There would have been a veto leading to a government shutdown and then Obamacare and Planned Parenthood would have been reinstated. You’re at the same point without the government shutdown. I guess it’s a disappointment only if your real objective was a government shutdown.

[demshateGod]

Obama would have shut the gov down.

[DoodleDawg]

So, what would have changed? What would be different? There would have been a veto leading to a government shutdown and then Obamacare and Planned Parenthood would have been reinstated. You’re at the same point without the government shutdown. I guess it’s a disappointment only if your real objective was a government shutdown.

Well if the objective is to end funding for Planned Parenthood and defund Obamacare then how will this accomplish anything?

[mrsmith]

“a disappointment only if your real objective was a government shutdown.”
Or the end of Obamacare.
No way would it be accomplished without a shutdown.

So the only people happy with this outcome are those whose real objective is that RINOs don’t suffer for their positions.

[wideawake]

Seems like you’re more of a chess player than the checkers players here.

[raybbr]

I guess it’s a disappointment only if your real objective was a government shutdown.

Explain how a "govt shutdown" is a bad thing and how it accomplishes funding the treasonists in the white house?