Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

“On the contrary, there was evidence, but the L.A. prosecutors refused to look at the evidence until the statute of limitations had already expired. “

Care to enlighten us as to the evidence of the 2008 ‘attack’?


9 posted on 01/07/2016 5:28:57 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator

“Care to enlighten us as to the evidence of the 2008 ‘attack’?

The incident mentioned in the article I had in mind was: “Los Angeles County prosecutors, citing the statute of limitations, previously declined to bring a criminal case in connection with a woman who reported she was molested at age 15 by Cosby at the Playboy Mansion in 1974.” Bill Cosby had a bad reputation among the Playmates at the
Playboy Mansion back then. They were concerned at how Bill Cosby appeared to be untouchable after these incidents, and prosecutors would not pursue such complaints at the time.

Recently, Bill Cosby has been recorded by police investigators confessed his perverted extra-marital sexual activities and his use of drugs to incapacitate the women in these sexual activities, so it is now a matter of record that he is in the habit of engaging in such sexual activities. Bill Cosby defends these sexual activities by trying to claim they wee consensual or did not take place at all. Consequently, there is his own admissions in evidence to support allegations of his sexual activities. What remains to be proven are the individual cases and whether or not each of those cases did or did not involve the informed consent of the women who are making the allegations.


11 posted on 01/07/2016 5:46:56 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson