ICR article image.
Posted on 01/06/2016 8:39:25 AM PST by fishtank
2015: Evolution Immobile
by Frank Sherwin, M.A. *
Advocates of vertical evolution think their beliefs are as factual as the earth orbiting the sun. However in 2015, science again shows something quite different.
Recent paleontological discoveries all point to minor variation and stasis—or standing still. Macroevolution is the holy grail of the secular faithful, but it continues to elude observation in sedimentary rocks and in the laboratory. 2015 is no different with evolutionists surprised to find creatures allegedly "millions of years old" that are just the same as their modern counterparts.
(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...
ICR article image.
adaptation.
evolutionists won’t stand for it. atleast not still, anyway.
First evolution.. in the truest sense of survival of the fittest( nature culls the herd).. is not anti biblical.....
Destruction by God, thing like The Great Flood or Sodom and Gomorrah is just that...God (or nature) cull out the unfit and promotes the fit....
Nothing is static in God plan.....else destruction by God has no meaning or purpose..and all act by God have meaning and purpose
Conversely looking at it from a scientific evolution perspective.....a several simple question can be asked....
Intelligently design created species exist currently ...thing like genetically modified food...
And as science goes forward, more designed and created species will exist...
So what will be the criteria or test that can or will scientifically distinguished the intelligently design species from the evolved?...
If science have no test to distinguish that now, how can science make the categorical statement that something has naturally evolve?...
the only thing I think could distinguish it would be looking in the fossil record... and bursts, sudden appearances of species in the fossil record would be consistent with fast created and inconsistent with slow evolve.
The second point on evolution is the theory itself cannot explain creation of life so you need to have a second mechanism have to accept an account for creation of life..evolution can only act something living..it can not start life..the first living thing species "zero" by definition could not have evolved from earlier living species so by evolution theory's own rules it can not have created all species ...that is fact ..
So I'm in the middle....
Evolution is not anti biblical and in fact can be demonstrated.
But to claim evolution as scientifically proved fact for all creation is also false
Punctuate my equilibrium and call me Nigel!
Doesn't make much sense, but it could be the basis for a really cool black light poster.
Hey, I like it! :-) Black light poster!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.