Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster

I don’t believe it was a hydrogen bomb.

If it was, though, it would mean cities would be a lot less radioactive after they explode them.


7 posted on 01/05/2016 7:46:49 PM PST by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind

“If it was, though, it would mean cities would be a lot less radioactive after they explode them.”

H-bombs release copious amounts of neutrons. Neutrons make stuff radioactive when they bombard them.


13 posted on 01/05/2016 7:50:54 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind; SunkenCiv; Nachum; EODGUY

No, even the original H-bombs were driven (ignited, and then fueled by a “conventional” Pu or U235 A-bomb. Exploded at ground level, the dust and debris blown up IS radioactive and DOES contaminate wider areas around the blast zone than a air-dropped A-bomb or H-bomb that explodes up above 15,000 - 20,000 feet altitude.

That’s why they thought A-bomb anti-aircraft missile would be effective. Blow ‘em up high enough, and the contamination is minimized, and is blown away from the target - maybe out to sea to the east.


29 posted on 01/05/2016 7:57:06 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson