Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut

“70’s - it was the 60’s, 70’s, 80’s, 90’s, 00’s. Second, not all of these women were “clawing their way into” the industry. Many of them were already sucessful in their own right.”

The dope fueled parties where minor starlets hoped to improve their position by improving their position were the beginning of this. After the late 50s and 70s party era, every woman who ever spent the night with him decided to cash in.

And no, they were all just breaking into the industry, basically unheard of and hoped an A-list guy would get them there. Call me when he dragged someone into his van. They were all party girls, using sex to advance, and when the advance didn’t come, they were pissed. Now is revenge time for them.
These were all chicks who wanted to drink, do drugs, and fool around with a married star. IE,,,sluts.

And you don’t know any more about it than I do, so spare me your self righteous BS.


17 posted on 01/01/2016 12:26:49 AM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

wrong again on all counts. You haven’t done your research have you? The facts prove you wrong. But go ahead and defend the rapist. I suppose you would defend Dahmer as just ‘expressing his sexuality’ or as ‘being hungry’. SMH


58 posted on 01/01/2016 11:37:51 AM PST by reaganaut (Insert tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson