Post #2 for what he said, instead of your little snippet.
Your desperate, sleazebag attempt to align yourself with a leftwing outlet in order to smear a Constitutional conservative is noted.
“Your desperate, sleazebag attempt to align yourself with a leftwing outlet in order to smear a Constitutional conservative is noted.”
desperate? What I think about Ted Cruz, and what you think about Ted Cruz, are both equally meaningless in the outcome of the election.
sleazebag attempt? It is a quote.
aligning with a leftwing outlet? When an outlet directly quotes someone, and it is a complete lie they fabricate, then the outlet is on its way to becoming finished. That is why they are reluctant to do so. Only the New York Times can do that and survive.
The donor understood what he meant. What do you think the donor understood Cruz to mean? Could he possibly have understood Cruz to mean that fighting gay marriage would not be Cruz’s priority? And could he possibly have understood Cruz to mean that Cruz drew a distinction between fighting for the Constitution and fighting gay marriage?