Posted on 12/21/2015 11:50:15 AM PST by Isara
Didn't think I had to, but then I remembered I was dealing with a delusional sophist:
Here's the head of the group that blessed and anointed Ted Cruz.
"I'm not in a position to opine on academic disputes between historians, but I can tell you that David Barton is a good man, a courageous leader and a friend,â Cruz told POLITICO."
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/david-barton-historian-right-christian-96443.html#ixzz3v9frw0Qu
This David Barton is also within Glenn Beck's wicked sphere of influence (as is Ted Cruz himself), and has defended the Mormon heretic Glenn Beck as a Christian:
https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=150770881618696
Of course, Beck is also involved in Dominionism's Ecumenical push to bring Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, whatever, into one "church."
"As you can see, one of the speakers was Word Faith heretic Kenneth Copeland's friend David Barton. Barton is aligned with the New Apostolic Reformation and dominionism,1 and as Brannon Howse has brought out:
On his April 4, 2011 David Bartonâs radio program description included, "Culture can be divided into 7 pillars of influence- Family, Religion, Education, Media, Entertainment, Business and Government."
This is the exact same pillars of C. Peter Wagnerâs New Apostolic Reformation "Seven Mountain Mandate". In a May 31, 2007 letter C. Peter Wagner wrote:
In my view it is not possible to get an operational handle on how to initiate corporate action toward social transformation without taking into account the seven mountains or what I like to call "molders of culture." The seven are religion, family, business, arts & entertainment, government, education, and media."
http://apprising.org/2012/08/07/david-barton-controversy/
you offer a concrete definition of dominionism.
Dominionism is the retarded cousin of Rushdoony's old Theonomy. It was pioneered by C. Peter Wagner and his New Apostolic Reformation cult. It differs from theonomy in that it's theology is stupider, but they come to the same conclusions.
BTW, why did you misquote me?
Didn't intend it to be a direct quote; it's mocking your stupid position. By the way, the "Sunday School Teacher" is entirely your fabrication. She's never described as such.
I said she was controversial.
To who? The SBC promotes her and her eastern mysticism and Roman Catholic apologia:
http://apprising.org/2012/05/06/southern-baptists-assist-the-roman-catholic-church-to-infiltrate-evangelicalism/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.