Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HomerBohn

The definition of ‘natural born citizen’ isn’t defined in the Constitution. It has been defined and re-defined through law and case law over the years.

Rubio isn’t qualified or my pick for a host of reasons but this aint one of them.

Foolish article


6 posted on 12/21/2015 6:18:12 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver

It seems to me that the Constitution is very clear. Only the President has a requirement for natural born citizen. The Founding Fathers obviously inserted that for a reason.

This country has allowed the Constitution to be subverted for many years. They pick and choose which part of it supports their position and twist the meaning of the part that does not.


33 posted on 12/21/2015 7:22:29 AM PST by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver
The definition of ‘natural born citizen’ isn’t defined in the Constitution.

Perhaps this will shed some light on the topic and your trove of facts:

Click Here

77 posted on 12/21/2015 8:22:09 AM PST by varon (Obama is a tumor.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver
Foolish article

Foolish comment. If the law only matters when it fits our purpose it is not law at all but tyranny.

142 posted on 12/21/2015 1:26:03 PM PST by itsahoot (Anyone receiving a Woo! Woo! for President has never won anything after the award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson