At first I thought that this might have been a Sharia Court but NO, it was a regular civil court, Southwark Crown Court. I think that the key for the acquittal, other than the certainty that Mr Abdulaziz had the best legal representation money could buy, is that the victim did a lot to place herself in harm's way.
The 18yo was out with a 24yo female friend at a nightclub when the friend 'hooked-up' with the perp, Mr Abdulaziz, who was sitting at a 1,500 USD cover charge table. The ladies went home with him and the older went into the bedroom while the victim sacked out on a couch, only to find the perp on top of her later.
The 'falling on top' story was used to explain how his sperm was found on her. The defense explanation is that it was on his hands and thus wiped off on the victim when he fell. Remember, in Great Britain, like the USofA, the prosecution has to prove beyond shadow of doubt, for the jury to convict.
Ugly, yes! But is it related to the perp's Islamic faith or Islam's influence in London? I submit, with all due respect (sincerely) to Mr Steyn, that had the perp's name been Smythe or Chin, the same outcome might easily have happened!
HE PENETRATED HER, that means his filthy, unwashed, greasy, slimy member was inside of her vagina, because he slipped and fell on her... pure bullshit.