Posted on 12/18/2015 12:48:28 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
“So, an air attack on Iran nuclear facilities, preemptive or responsive, would be one way missions. So, these subs are a smart solution for sure.”
Thanks for your added analysis. I appreciate being further schooled on the tactics of weaponry, in this case, what Israel wants these subs for. I like it when those in the know or are connected with the military in some fashion, join in the conversation. Imparting one’s expertise and/or knowledge is very important to both Freepers and Visitors to FR. Here’s to lifelong learning; It’s good for all of us. Our daily dose, lol.
Three missiles isn’t a bad number in one sense. Israel’s sub fleet is small (5-6 boats in another year) and their maritime access is somewhat limited. The anti-sub and anti-ship roles cannot be ignored.
“Who sez things will be cozy between Trump and Israel? Didn’t Trump pizz on Netanyahu’s leg two weeks ago, and have to cancel a visit, etc?”
All I’m saying is that Trump would NEVER have a standing order to shoot down any Israeli military craft - especially any heading towards Iran.
Yes. I would even say I could foresee a much improved rapport with Israel under Donald. But I would hope and expect these little dust-ups to be few and far between, too.
Ideally, Don would keep his nose out of Israel’s business. They only need to KNOW we’ve got their back.
Good take!
taking a look! thanks for the link
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.