Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/17/2015 10:52:51 AM PST by sparklite2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sparklite2
No more freedom of speech or freedom of the press in our country.

Why did they complain? Throw it in the basket. geez

2 posted on 12/17/2015 10:56:39 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

The guy will get his job back, if he wants it; or a huge settlement.


3 posted on 12/17/2015 10:59:52 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

It was one short paragraph in a whole book, expressing views the majority hold.


4 posted on 12/17/2015 11:00:54 AM PST by ctdonath2 (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the week or the timid. - Ike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

Our “courts” with their clown “judges” have turned into the Greatest Show On Earth. The Founding Fathers never saw this coming.


6 posted on 12/17/2015 11:04:43 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Have you unpacked from your white privilege guilt trip yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

So if I simply comment that homosexuals, across the board, suffer much higher rates of HIV, HepC, cancer, drug addiction and suicide and conclude it is therefore not a healthy lifestyle - that is “hate speech?”


8 posted on 12/17/2015 11:05:41 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2
When one protected class over-rules another, the truth of the saying attributed to Voltaire becomes clear; "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"
10 posted on 12/17/2015 11:15:44 AM PST by SES1066 (Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

If he hadn’t handed out the book at work, I think he’d have a slam-dunk case. But if his doing that violated some sort of policy, and if the policy itself was not patently illegal, his case might be in jeopardy.


11 posted on 12/17/2015 11:16:26 AM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

“Cochran called homosexuality ‘vulgar’ and ‘the opposite of purity.’”

Vulgar:
1. Lacking sophistication or good taste; unrefined
1.1 Making explicit and offensive reference to sex or bodily functions; coarse and rude

Purity:
1. Freedom from adulteration or contamination
1.1 Freedom from immorality, especially of a sexual nature

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/

Seems like his statements were completely factual to me.


13 posted on 12/17/2015 11:34:59 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

Does anyone see this lawsuit going anywhere with a court systems that bends over for the sodomites?


15 posted on 12/17/2015 11:36:18 AM PST by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2
Lawsuit by ex-Atlanta fire chief critical of homosexuality accurately describing Biblical Christianity to proceed

Fixed.


17 posted on 12/17/2015 11:55:46 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2
...Cochran called homosexuality 'vulgar' and 'the opposite of purity.'

Truth: It's the new HATE SPEECH.

20 posted on 12/17/2015 12:17:24 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson