[ClearCase_guy]

No one should EVER again be willing to accept “the lesser of two evils” when the GOP puts up a bad candidate.

Dole?
McCain?
Romney?
Bush?

For the rest of my life, I will stay home if the GOP can’t give me someone I’m excited about.
The GOP will not support the people’s choice? The people should not support the establishment choice.

[Hojczyk]

The first George Bush is why were in this mess….Tossed the Reagan Revolution the first day….

Can you imagine what it would be like if Trump never got in

[vette6387]

“For the rest of my life, I will stay home if the GOP can’t give me someone I’m excited about.
The GOP will not support the people’s choice? The people should not support the establishment choice.”

Me too!

[norwaypinesavage]

Dole?
McCain?
Romney?
Bush?

So, instead, you give us:
Clinton
Obama
Obama
Clinton

I wouldn't call that very smart logic.

[RFEngineer]

“No one should EVER again be willing to accept “the lesser of two evils” when the GOP puts up a bad candidate.”

Exactly.

But isn’t it also interesting that the Saudis and their pleasure goats, the GOPe, are braying at the same time about the demise of the political status quo represented by a Trump candidacy.

I don’t think it’s ever been clearer that the Bush family have been the coffee boys for the Saudis, and their minions have now pervaded the GOPe - a wholly-owned subsidiary of Aramco.

Now that the money is running out, the Saudis can’t buy the influence they once were able to.

[abb]

Ah, yes. The old “lesser of two evils” conundrum. I’ve been voting since I was 21 in 1971, and with one notable exception, I’ve never voted for a perfect candidate.

In 1982, I ran for a city council seat and voted for myself. That’s the only time I can say I voted for someone who I agreed with 100%