It’s a good time to sponsor a resolution in Congress renouncing sharia law as incompatible with the Constitution of the United States. Let’s see who votes against it.
A muslim that renounces sharia has left islam and is an apostate. sharia is islam.
Then it is in direct conflict with the oath they took and they should be removed from office.
So I’m sure the feminists will march on Washington and hold protests on how muslims treat women... no?.... nothing?
(crickets)
Oh, I see, they only protest against EVIL republicans... preferably Christian white males.
Yep, the Christian white males are the REAL oppressors.
They wouldn't be faithful islamoterrorists if they did.
Of course they won’t. It’s a rallying cry, and Sharia wouldn’t significantly affect them.
Sharia, in all its glory, doesn’t seem to be applied as strictly to the Islamic ruling class.
It’s a lot like our laws, which of late, have been enforced differently for those at the top than for the rest of us.
Any muslim that takes any oath, for citizenship or office, is lying, which is sanctioned by the koran.
I cannot believe we are finally having this discussion by people in DC.
thanks to the Trump effect.
So why shouldn't their U.S. citizenship be voided, and why shouldn't they be fined and deported?
"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."
They should pass legislation making Sharia illegal in the United States as it is incompatible with the Constitution.
Let’s see Barry try to veto that !
Notice that Keith Ellison called King’s comments “ignorant” but did not say that he does, in fact, renounce sharia. Somebody needs to ask these 2 Muslims in Congress how they can swear to defend the US Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic when they themselves support sharia, which is diametrically opposed to the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Well the liberals are all for outlawing the Ten Commandments and is many places for all intents and purposes have been successful.
Lets not forget the Muslim Brotherhood residing in the White House and around the powers of Washington.
We’ve been sold out and no one recognizes it in Washington.
What about the muslims in the whitehouse?
Followers of Mohammed not only claim, but truly believe that God has authorized them to kill those who refuse to submit to their version of Gods will.
That is a basic tenet of that religion. A claim which goes unchallanged. While it is understandable for atheists which most socialists are, not to approach that claim on a theological basis but by bombing and killing those who believe in it will not end its practice.
It is bewildering why many Christian clergy concerned about quote, political correctness, unquote, refuse to address what an insult to God it is, and worse yet, are unable to condem, then convince and convert, its advocates and adhearants they are followers of an evil creed .
Islam as construed with its portrayal of a mercyless evil deity approving using deception and deceit is an abomination which must be discredited and condemed. And that can only be done by attacking its assertions and tenets. Certainly not by deying they do not exist. .
The Koran which was not given to Mohammed by God but by some angel .Demanding enforcement of sharia law which draws heavily from the Torah.
It is a pseudo religious concoction using monotheistic selected texts, taken and misconstrued from the old (bible) and new testaments.
Both of which cite the Almighty has granted free will to accept or obey his laws. That God is the final judge not man:
Sodom and Gormora ,and Let he who is without sin cast the stone, are outstanding examples from both books. Both deal with sin and Gods decision. One toward a group, the other to an individual, neither is left to man.
Yet followers of Mohammed under the severest of penalties are forbidden to read either which would refute that assertion in a creed which institutionalizes disgusting arab tribal mores, observances,and customs. Claiming adhearants are authorized by our Creator to demand submission to it or suffer an ignominious death administered by followers of Islam simply because they answer the call to prayer 5 times a day.
http://www.theusmat.com/islamandfreewill.htm