Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Footage of Future USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000) at Sea
gCaptain ^ | December 8, 2015 | Mike Schuler

Posted on 12/09/2015 6:11:18 AM PST by artichokegrower

The future USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000) departed the General Dynamics Bath Iron Works shipyard in Maine on Monday for its first at-sea tests and trials in the Atlantic Ocean.

(Excerpt) Read more at gcaptain.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: boondoggle; pos; wasteofmoney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Ramming speed! Hate to be on that fore deck in any kind of weather.
1 posted on 12/09/2015 6:11:18 AM PST by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Link to video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSJ_uFZEuwo


2 posted on 12/09/2015 6:11:36 AM PST by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Really looks like CGI superimposed on the wake of a same sized ship. Shadows and helo image is good.
3 posted on 12/09/2015 6:14:29 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ ("It gets late early around here..." Yogi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

It does. Not saying it’s fake, but it looks so real it looks fake.


4 posted on 12/09/2015 6:20:15 AM PST by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon

Let’s see it preform in heavy weather ... flat calm is no test other than it floats, moves and turns. Let’s see if the forward guns stay attached as the bow goes under water.


5 posted on 12/09/2015 6:30:43 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Per Wikipedia, the Captain is named James Kirk.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Zumwalt


6 posted on 12/09/2015 6:38:08 AM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

submerged trials to start soon


7 posted on 12/09/2015 7:07:35 AM PST by telstar12.5 (...always bring gunships to a gun fight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

8 posted on 12/09/2015 7:14:04 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF
Let’s see it preform in heavy weather ... flat calm is no test other than it floats, moves and turns. Let’s see if the forward guns stay attached as the bow goes under water.

Looks like it has the same amount of freeboard as a Burke-class does.

9 posted on 12/09/2015 7:18:41 AM PST by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Yes, what looks like missile turrets would probably be awash in sea water.

I served on DD-951, the USS Turner Joy, and I distinctly remember one day in the Western Pacific we were racing like hell to get out of the way of a typhoon. There were huge ocean swells, and veryone aboard was seasick — except for the Executive Officer, thankfully!

The ship rocked like crazy. At least the Zumwalt class looks to be a larger vessel and more stable platform. Ideal for operating in the Med and Persian Gulf.


10 posted on 12/09/2015 7:20:38 AM PST by poconopundit (When the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government. Franklin, Const. Conv.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PIF

That hull form can fool you to look at it, but it is much more seakindly than the flared bow. This type of stem has been used for around 10 years on oilfield service ships in the North Sea (called an X-bow) with excellent results in very heavy weather. Pitching is what causes the bows to get under a head sea, and this type of bows hardly pitches at all.

You can see from the small bow wave and clean wake that the hull form is very efficient, resulting in lower fuel consumption.


11 posted on 12/09/2015 7:59:11 AM PST by punchamullah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Like hitting a 30ft wave head on. Turn into a submarine?


12 posted on 12/09/2015 8:05:22 AM PST by painter ( Isaiah: �Woe to those who call evil good and good evil,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: punchamullah

A Study of the Hull - not good.
“The DDG 1000 design, per computer modeling of capsize risk (see Fig. 15) in real world circumstances, incline to be more vulnerable to such complete systems requirements failure of the vessel, compounded with the tragic potential of the loss of all hands.”

US NAVY - DDG 1000 - Zumwalt Class Destroyer, Tumblehome Hull
http://www.phisicalpsience.com/public/Tumblehome_Hull_DDG-1000/Tumblehome_Hull_DDG-1000.html

This whole thing may be moot anyway:
“ ... the third ship of the class, the Lyndon B. Johnson (DDG 1002), is on the budget chopping block. The result would leave the Navy with two of the advanced destroyers. Initially these radically new destroyers were meant to replace four Iowa-class battleships and 31 Spruance-class destroyers. The Zumwalts proved too expensive and mass production was cancelled.” http://www.strategypage.com/dls/articles/The-Zumwalts-Are-Fading-Away-10-26-2015.asp


13 posted on 12/09/2015 8:11:59 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: painter

Submarine...yeah, this thing reminds me of the Submarine in League of Extraordinary Gentlemen or whatever that film was called. Shaped for radar rejection, but will it be able to take any kind of hit?


14 posted on 12/09/2015 8:21:37 AM PST by Boowhoknew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: punchamullah
You can see from the small bow wave and clean wake that the hull form is very efficient, resulting in lower fuel consumption.

I have no doubt this hull is hydrodynamic, seaworthy and energy-efficient. It's just such a drastic departure from classic hulls that it's difficult for many old salts to willingly accept them. They're simply not aesthetically pleasing to the eye.

15 posted on 12/09/2015 8:24:05 AM PST by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: punchamullah
You can see from the small bow wave and clean wake that the hull form is very efficient, resulting in lower fuel consumption.

I have no doubt this hull is hydrodynamic, seaworthy and energy-efficient. It's just such a drastic departure from classic hulls that it's difficult for many old salts to willingly accept them. They're simply not aesthetically pleasing to the eye.

16 posted on 12/09/2015 8:24:05 AM PST by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Stealth marine vessel


17 posted on 12/09/2015 8:29:44 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPyes but now I must concentratc.;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trumping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

I’m a total landlubber, save for my love of the seafaring life in the Jack Aubrey series.

Why are a lot of people wary of this ship’s sailing qualities?


18 posted on 12/09/2015 8:32:27 AM PST by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter

See here: US NAVY - DDG 1000 - Zumwalt Class Destroyer, Tumblehome Hull
http://www.phisicalpsience.com/public/Tumblehome_Hull_DDG-1000/Tumblehome_Hull_DDG-1000.html

One of two hulls - no more to be built - too expensive. Probably burn like crazy when hit - sea gals not able to carry hoses for fire suppression. ETC.


19 posted on 12/09/2015 8:52:40 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Since it is larger, faster, and better armed, the USS Zumwalt just might be the prototype for the replacement for the Ticonderoga Class cruiser.

We already have CRUDESRONs, why not a cruiser-sized destroyer?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ticonderoga-class_cruiser

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zumwalt-class_destroyer


20 posted on 12/09/2015 1:03:39 PM PST by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson