“her success rate which was supposedly as high as 85 per cent”
So she was a false prophet then.
>> So she was a false prophet then.
So you'll accept nothing less than perfection in those with foresight? I'm around zero, myself, in terms of predicting the future. I think 85% is very impressive.
Considering that she was blind, I find that impressive. Many libs have sight and can’t even see (or refuse to see) the destruction their ideas and policies cause.