Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarchonDC09122009

Wow, that seriously does not look good. Where’s the solution to the vulnerabilities? They all but admit heavy seas could rip the forward deck gun right of the ship and flood the hull!


64 posted on 12/07/2015 9:32:35 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker

I know. This new class ship cannot handle severe sea states 7, 8 and definitely not 9, conditions.
Fatal pitch, roll and broach attributes in very heavy seas.
How could this happen with so many competent naval ship design engineers?
When you add up all the appalling misjudgement and mistakes, it appears that all levels of this nations leaders are adle-brained and are working for the other team.
Just add up all the cluster-fuk policy decisions, untrustworthy alliances, arming our enemies, and more.
They kill the well performing A-10 and F-22.
Commit a Trillion dollars to the poor performing F-35.
Build the Littoral sitting duck ships, and now this Burial-at-Sea Tumblehome hull battleship...
WTF?
I miss the 80’s Fiercely!


65 posted on 12/07/2015 9:53:50 PM PST by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson