Skip to comments.
NY Times advocates gun CONFISCATION in jaw-dropping ‘first front-page editorial since 1920!’
Biz PAC Review ^
| 12/5/2015
| Steve Berman
Posted on 12/06/2015 4:51:51 AM PST by HomerBohn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161 next last
To: pepsionice
If the police won’t do it, Obama will issue executive orders to every federal agency and the military to do. And if they won’t do it, he’ll seek United Nations intervention.
41
posted on
12/06/2015 5:13:10 AM PST
by
Loyalist
(Who whom?)
To: HomerBohn
42
posted on
12/06/2015 5:13:30 AM PST
by
HotHunt
To: MayflowerMadam
The Judge and Hannity are the last two voices of sanity on FAUX.
43
posted on
12/06/2015 5:15:01 AM PST
by
BigEdLB
(Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back - Donald Trump)
To: HomerBohn
What better time than during a presidential election to show, at long last, that our nation has retained its sense of decency? Please, Democrats, do this! Make gun confiscation a "Contract with America"-type platform to run on.
44
posted on
12/06/2015 5:18:31 AM PST
by
Drew68
To: bert
a theme in old western movies is.. In the end, gun control didn't work out too well for Little Bill.
Bill Munny made sure of that.
45
posted on
12/06/2015 5:18:31 AM PST
by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is libertye)
To: HomerBohn
...âfirst front-page editorial since 1920!â BS! Their whole newspaper is nothing but an editorial, cleverly disguised as news.
To: BigEdLB
Free the budgies. If they love you they will stay.
47
posted on
12/06/2015 5:18:37 AM PST
by
JohnnyP
To: IncPen
Is it any coincidence that this 'historic' editorial comes the morning that Obama is going to hector lecture 'address' the nation?
48
posted on
12/06/2015 5:18:42 AM PST
by
IncPen
(Not one single patriot in Washington, DC.)
To: Bushbacker1
"cleverly disguised"
You give them WAY too much credit...
49
posted on
12/06/2015 5:20:05 AM PST
by
IncPen
(Not one single patriot in Washington, DC.)
To: HomerBohn
“In its first front-page editorial since the end of the First World War”
The NYT has been nothing but front-page editorials for many years now.
They quit reporting actual news some decades ago.
50
posted on
12/06/2015 5:20:25 AM PST
by
Jeeper
(The national security of the United States can never be left in the hands of liberals.)
To: HomerBohn
called civilian gun ownership ââ¬Åa moral outrage and a national disgrace.ââ¬Â First of all, no one at the Times is qualified to discuss morals or ethics. Second of all, no one at the Times has the courage to actually go out and confiscate anything. And lastly, buy stock in the manufacturer of body bags.
5.56mm
51
posted on
12/06/2015 5:21:09 AM PST
by
M Kehoe
To: HomerBohn
The enemy’s greatest weakness is overconfidence.
Like all Marxists, they believe in the Iron Laws of History, that history is linear with a positive slope, that, as Leonid Brezhnev put it, “the armies of socialism march in only one direction”.
They have made tremendous gains with Project Obama, but they have not consolidated them and they are at risk - quite enormous risk, actually - from the upcoming US electoral process.
There has been an awakening - have you felt it?
52
posted on
12/06/2015 5:21:21 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
(Diseases desperate grown Are by desperate appliance relieved Or not at al)
To: wiggen
Are they running interference for his speech tonight?Yep
Just like they do 24/7/365
53
posted on
12/06/2015 5:21:22 AM PST
by
TYVets
To: IncPen
Letâs end the First Amendment. Just end the free press part. License reporters and tax printing presses and, say 10 cents, tax per word printed.
(I can hear it now, "But it's our God given right...")
54
posted on
12/06/2015 5:22:30 AM PST
by
CPOSharky
(Ban "gun free" zones. They are magnets for mass killers.)
To: HomerBohn
But who listens? Regressives? ... they already believe this. So there will be no impact on those people. The other ones who listen - like us, are not influenced against guns...we become enraged, fearful of confiscation and buy more of them. (Look at gun sales). So, like Obama becoming the biggest gun salesman in our time, the NYT just put a huge advertisement in page 1 to influence people TO BUY MORE GUNS. Their actions are causing a far greater reaction AGAINST their "cause" than FOR their cause. Fun to watch.
I don't fear the NYT, I fear the liberal neighbor that voted for Obama...s/he is the danger to us. S/he is the one who would see something, but remain silent to be politically correct, endangering all of us. Muslims have a jihadi cancer in their midst...we have regressives in our neighborhoods...just as dangerous. They actually are a strange alliance and don't even know it. In CA the person who did not report something strange was a jihadi accomplice. So just as dangerous.
55
posted on
12/06/2015 5:24:03 AM PST
by
ThePatriotsFlag
( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else)
To: HomerBohn
What a bunch of fools!
Only a bigger fool would take these knuckle-dragging troglodytes seriously.
56
posted on
12/06/2015 5:25:30 AM PST
by
Savage Beast
("History is not just cruel. It's witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
To: fhayek
The hoplophobes like to claim the Second Amendment protects muzzle-loading flintlocks, as those are the arms extant at the time the Constitution was written.
By that logic, we can respond that the First Amendment “press” clause protects only single-sheet manually-operated printing presses.
57
posted on
12/06/2015 5:25:36 AM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
Comment #58 Removed by Moderator
To: HotHunt
He should be asked “Do you advocate starting the confiscation with your own armed bodyguards?”.
59
posted on
12/06/2015 5:28:27 AM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Neoliberalnot
The New York Times carried water for Stalin 80 years ago; now they’re simply doing the same for “our Stalin”.
60
posted on
12/06/2015 5:28:27 AM PST
by
kearnyirish2
(Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson