Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik's inexplicable path toward violence
Los Angeles Times ^ | December 5, 2015 | by Sandy Banks

Posted on 12/05/2015 1:29:59 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Was it radical religious terrorism or murderous workplace revenge?

Are guns the problem or would more guns have been the solution?

Do we close our borders to people whose religion we don't trust, or treat them with compassion and tolerance?

Those questions are bound to keep swirling around an investigation that's managed to explain precisely what happened this week in San Bernardino but cannot tell us why the shooting happened or what it means.

The mystery, the contradictions and the breach of convention make the holiday party siege particularly unsettling.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: islam; islamists; muslim; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
"Radical religious" terrorism?
1 posted on 12/05/2015 1:29:59 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Inexplicable ok.


2 posted on 12/05/2015 1:31:19 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I may have an explanation...


3 posted on 12/05/2015 1:31:42 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Sandy Banks?

In HS we had a Sandy Shore....

Look you retarded wench, Islam is out to get YOU!

4 posted on 12/05/2015 1:31:44 PM PST by Paladin2 (my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“inexplicable”!? Seems pretty splicable to me.


5 posted on 12/05/2015 1:31:45 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Inexplicable? Just look at the Koran. Nothing radical about the terrorists- just active jidahists. I refuse to use the term “radical” islam anymore. It is redundant.


6 posted on 12/05/2015 1:32:42 PM PST by austingirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Bet the whole family knows much more.


7 posted on 12/05/2015 1:33:08 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Violence” my ***. This was radical Islamic TERRORISM.


8 posted on 12/05/2015 1:33:49 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Who is fact checking the state controlled, leftwing media's fact checkers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik's inexplicable path toward violence

The Los Angeles Slime's inexplicable path toward Leftist anti American Propaganda

9 posted on 12/05/2015 1:34:18 PM PST by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“inexplicable” path to violence!????

Dear LATimes,

Please read...or just ‘google!’... the G-damned Koran!

(It COMMANDS Moslems to attack and either subjugate or murder us infidels.....)

it would sure help us all, LATimes, if you’d instruct your writers to do even just a tiny bit of homework ... before you print misleading lines like this


10 posted on 12/05/2015 1:34:28 PM PST by faithhopecharity (Brilliant, funny, and incisive Tagline coming to this space soon.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Jihad. Not even really “sudden”.


11 posted on 12/05/2015 1:34:45 PM PST by Paladin2 (my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Inexplicable...

They were muslim, that’s all the plicable you need.


12 posted on 12/05/2015 1:35:05 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

>>Those questions are bound to keep swirling around an investigation that’s managed to explain precisely what happened this week in San Bernardino but cannot tell us why the shooting happened or what it means.

Oh my...their level of stupid makes my brain hurt!

When derrp meets durka durka.


13 posted on 12/05/2015 1:35:26 PM PST by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Tashfeen Malik (King) is a nom de guerre for a Muslim Jihadist from the annals of Muslim history. "

Really stupid wench...

14 posted on 12/05/2015 1:36:05 PM PST by Paladin2 (my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The Los Angeles Times is clueless as the day is long.


15 posted on 12/05/2015 1:36:59 PM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Nothing inexplicable about jihad except to the Los Angeles Times.


16 posted on 12/05/2015 1:37:32 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

but cannot tell us why the shooting happened or what it means.

The shooting happened because of Islam.
What it means is Islam war on America and Western civilization continues.


17 posted on 12/05/2015 1:37:40 PM PST by 48th SPS Crusader (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Do we close our borders to people whose religion we don't trust


18 posted on 12/05/2015 1:38:40 PM PST by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown Are by desperate appliance relieved Or not at al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austingirl

>> I refuse to use the term “radical” islam anymore. It is redundant.

“Radical” ANYTHING is redundant. “Radical” means “to the root”. A radical muslim is a practicing muslim who knows the content of his koran. A non-radical (or “moderate”) muslim is a backslider or who practices a westernized version of his satanic religion.


19 posted on 12/05/2015 1:39:07 PM PST by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: austingirl

I’ve read that Middle East Muslim scholars themselves have stated Islam is Islam, there is NO “moderate” vs. “radical” distinction!


20 posted on 12/05/2015 1:42:43 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson