Skip to comments.
Rocky Mount man guilty of hanging a noose is jailed over new yard sign
Roanoke Times ^
| December 2, 2015
| Neil Harvey
Posted on 12/03/2015 12:57:14 PM PST by sparklite2
The Rocky Mount man who was convicted of hanging a noose in his front yard - and who is due to be sentenced for that crime next week - is back in jail, accused of making another provocative public display.
At his trial in September, Jack Eugene Turner, 52, was found guilty of a Class 6 felony. He was allowed to remain free on bond, but one of the conditions of his release was that he not post any further symbols or messages in his yard on Lindsey Lane.
On Tuesday, police said Turner was arrested for a second time after he put up a sign in front of his home that read 'N----- lives don't matter. Got rope?'
(Excerpt) Read more at roanoke.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: freespeech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Because free speech is only free if it offends no one.
To: sparklite2
2
posted on
12/03/2015 12:58:44 PM PST
by
Daveinyork
("Trusting government with money and power is like trusting teenaged boys with whiskey and car keys",)
To: sparklite2
Turner should be free to post whatever he likes. Last time I looked - terminal stupidity was not outlawed in the Constitution.
3
posted on
12/03/2015 12:59:13 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
To: sparklite2
Judge Joseph Canada ruled that Turner had violated a 2009 Virginia statute that prohibits hanging a noose to intimidate someone, a felony that carries penalties ranging from no jail time to up to five years in prison and fines of $2,500. "The statute, in my opinion, was written for a case like this," Canada said.
4
posted on
12/03/2015 12:59:29 PM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.)
To: sparklite2
The guy is a jerk but that shouldn’t be illegal.
5
posted on
12/03/2015 1:00:19 PM PST
by
XRdsRev
(New Jersey - Crossroads of the American Revolution)
To: sparklite2
Yes, but stupidity like his needs restrainin’.
6
posted on
12/03/2015 1:00:23 PM PST
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: JimRed
By restrainin’ I don’t mean imprisonment, except for his own protection.
8
posted on
12/03/2015 1:01:45 PM PST
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: sparklite2
Not my kind of guy obviously but he should be free to say whatever he wants on his own property.
It neither breaks my leg nor picks my pocket.
9
posted on
12/03/2015 1:01:46 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
To: sparklite2
There is a law against hanging a noose on ones front lawn?
To: Tax-chick
Sounds like a case for the Supreme Court. I have no doubt he would win if he fights it.
To: XRdsRev
12
posted on
12/03/2015 1:03:43 PM PST
by
smartyaz
To: Boogieman
“Sounds like a case for the Supreme Court. I have no doubt he would win if he fights it.”
I wouldn’t put anything past the supremes these days.
13
posted on
12/03/2015 1:04:56 PM PST
by
lacrew
To: Tax-chick
Unless the guy was threatening to slip the noose over someone's head, how could it be "intimidating'?
Are the blacks in that area that easily intimidated? I doubt it, more likely the pansy white liberals.
To: sparklite2
Two of my children are black. I want crazies like that to make themselves visible so we know to stay away from them. I find the “I Love Obamacare” bumperstickers to be just as offensive, where do we stop?
15
posted on
12/03/2015 1:06:37 PM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: Boogieman
It sounds like the law wants to treat “noose-displaying” as a credible threat to attempt to harm another person. Is that consistent with other types of credible threat to harm?
For example, suppose you’re standing in someone’s front yard with a gun, and you say, “I’m going to shoot you!” Would that be a felony?
16
posted on
12/03/2015 1:07:00 PM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.)
To: JimRed
Yes, but stupidity like his needs restraininâ.
It is hard to come up with enough laws to restrain creative stupidity.
17
posted on
12/03/2015 1:07:56 PM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: doorgunner69
Unless the guy was threatening to slip the noose over someone's head, how could it be "intimidating"?It appears that the law treats the display of the noose as a specific threat of harm to individual black people.
I'm not defending it, just trying to understand it.
18
posted on
12/03/2015 1:08:22 PM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.)
To: sparklite2
19
posted on
12/03/2015 1:11:15 PM PST
by
matt1234
(Note to GOPe lurkers: I and thousands like me will NEVER vote for Jeb Bush)
To: sparklite2
The Rocky Mount man who was convicted of hanging a noose in his front yard A rather blatantly unconstitutional law.
20
posted on
12/03/2015 1:16:27 PM PST
by
TheDon
(BO must be replaced immediately for the good of the nation and the world!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson