Posted on 12/01/2015 11:33:45 AM PST by don-o
Try comments 6 and 17 in this thread...
You are correct. All 106 killed or injured all the victims according to the indictment.
Ping poster of #6. Grock, are you asserting that the cops fired on bikers for no reason at all?
Boog - your 17 is just self referential. That all ya got?
No. I am saying there is little information available on just what the police did do.
I meant #18, sorry, that’s the one where one of you paranoids equates law enforcement with “Baghdad Bob”.
If you really want to try to deny this stuff, I can go drag up past WACO threads where we’ll find plenty of explicit statements to this effect by your fan club. Do you really want to go there?
There is no “fan club”. And it would be in line with standard protocol and custom here to ping people who you are referring to.
As glock confirmed, you misrepresented his comment.
And anyone who has followed this knows that “Baghdad Bob” refers to Patrick Swanton, the mouthpiece of Waco PD (until the Wall of Silence was imposed.)
What are you talking about? What is “this stuff”?
I do acknowledge a few drive-by comments from hotheads; but the vast majority of posts related to the matter have valid questions about police conduct of 5/17.
One of mine continues to be, who was running the show that day? Who decided that sitting in their cars was the proper posture for Waco PD in what was expected to be a potential scene of confrontation and friction?
“And anyone who has followed this knows that âBaghdad Bobâ refers to Patrick Swanton, the mouthpiece of Waco PD (until the Wall of Silence was imposed.)”
Exactly, and the fact that it is standard practice for you and your fan club to refer to the man like that shows that you all swallow this conspiracy nonsense. You just don’t like being called out on it.
“I do acknowledge a few drive-by comments from hotheads...”
Comments that I have never, not once, seen you decide to “butt in” and try to police, whereas you constantly do that if anyone calls one of your fan club out on their paranoid conspiracy theories. So it’s transparent which side you come down on buddy.
You want me to do your research for you? Get a grip.
No. I want you to back up the claim that YOU made. I want to read about folks strolling out of a restaurant with a firefight going on next door.
It was all a big misunderstanding about a noise complaint from the Twin Peaks parking lot and attached shooting range. /s
“You are correct. All 106 killed or injured all the victims according to the indictment.
Perhaps you are not aware that you can be charged with murder even if you didn’t actually kill someone!
True example:
Two dudes go to a house to burglarize/rob. Owner shoots and kills one dude. Second dude was charged with murder.
“You want me to do your research for you? Get a grip.”
I don’t think any of them were interested in researching the facts.
“Violation of the First, Fourth and Eighth Amendments are “paranoid conspiracy theories?””
Months ago, I asked you to cite specific examples of these violations.
crickets still chirping ....
“Had someone been shooting at police,”
Are you trying to claim that no bikers fired guns??????
Copy that...I just cut and pasted an answer he gave you on an earlier thread.
It is pretty much a given that bikers fired guns at some point. We have absolutely no information to indicate any firearms were fired at police.
Of course, this has been discussed in detail over and over. You know good and well what the violations are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.