Just sayin'...
Making Kasich look like a TOTAL IDIOT. Good for her, but too little, and FAR TOO LATE.
...and that face, OMG, that face.
Who is Fiorina?
While our politicians and leaders work tirelessly to solve what might be the problems of the 22nd century, real 21st century problems continue to boil out of control.
-Mark Steyn
Try asking any of the people who are having their heads hacked off if they give a rip about climate change........
“Sea rates”? At the risk of being picky, do people who write articles proofread at all?
When you lack any leadership ability, have no clue how to deal with the muslims, have already alienated must of Americas allies you turn to “climate change” for a distraction.
Chris Wallace, as usual, repeatedly used key left wing phraseology to try and control the direction of his fundamentally flawed narrative.
Regardless of Fiorina’s more debatable positions and chances as a presidential candidate, when Wallace used the term “alleged” in describing the Planned Parenthood sale of unborn human body parts, Carly Fiorina correctly and succinctly dismantled his narrative by restating *it was actually Planned Parenthood which was caught disclosing the sale of baby body parts, removing the false flag narrative of some right wing contrived story (which Wallace was inferring).
She accurately used the term “delusional” in describing Obama’s climate agenda as well.
Wallace’s facial expression was priceless. He was just steamrolled by an intelligent female with the truth.
He simply could not argue with her.
You mean a Republican candidate is slamming someone besides Trump?
Nothing could be further from the truth.
First off, there is no proof that the Earth is warming. In fact all science points to the fact that the Earth is cooling.
Second, there is no real proof that atmospheric carbon dioxide in the trace quantities of roughly 0.04% of the atmosphere (or 400ppm ) has any significant impact on solar heating and green house effect, not that there would be any significant impact on climate even if the concentration of CO2 went up by even 3-5 times because the trace amounts are still insignificant compared to the other components of the atmosphere.
Third, there is no proof that any increase in the Earth's mean temperature would have a negative effect on climate or the environment. However, there is proof that a slight rise in Earths man temperature would be beneficial for plant growing seasons and that the higher CO2 concentrations combined with the longer and warmer growing sense would have a very beneficial effect on plant life, especially plants that are used as food crops.
Fourth, any warming caused by CO2 would be very gradual and would be caught immediately by the extensive array of very precise weather satellites and earth borne monitoring stations built during the last 20 years that are now proving to us that global warming is not happening and that global cooling is the actual situation.
Fifth, man made atmospheric CO2 levels are a byproduct of buying fossil fuels that can be rapidly reversed and returned to lower levels simply by cutting back on the burning of fossil fuels and letting the Earth's natural process for consuming and fixing CO2 do their jobs. This reversion of atmospheric CO2 levels would happen over a period of of a year or so through the Earth's normal consumption of CO2 by plants, microbes, various chemical process, absorption of CO2 by the oceans, rain, ect as part of the Earth's Carbon Cycle.
As a general rule, bring fossil fuels for energy is a waste of valuable resources and can be phased out in favor of Nuclear or next generation solar and other power sources as soon as their technology is matured to the point where they are technically practical and economically viable.
On day in the future we will see clean nuclear energy and advanced technology nuclear fission and fusion power plants, solar, hydroelectric, geothermal power generation systems taking over and phasing out the burning of fossil fuel, but for right now the only viable alternative to fossil
fuels is Nuclear fission reactors. Such reactors safely and efficiently supplied most of Europe's power requirements until Green Madness caused EU politicians to shutter it's networks and bankrupt European economies with an expensive, unworkable, unreliable and ultimately disastrous and economically ruinous scheme to replace nuclear power with technically unready sources “Green Energy” that are still in the basic developmental stages, are not environmentally friendly, are unreliable and at the capricious whims of the weather and cannot supply sufficient power to meet EU energy needs.
If we are concerned about CO2 emissions, the best way to address the situation in the short term with next generation Nuclear Power Plants.
The big Environmental issue is really how the Third World is going to produce it's energy as it industrializes because the emissions and pollution from the current Industrial Nations are decreasing as products become more energy efficient and pollution controls get better and better.
What is required is plan to evolve a series of efficient, next generation energy production systems so that the Third World industrializes using clean , modern and efficient power generation and manufacturing technology.
The current slash and burn, toxic waste contaminated Brown Fields producing model for economic development pioneered by China that ignores environmental anti pollution control technology that pollutes the air and environment with toxic chemicals to save money to lower production costs is not sustainable
If we do not learn from the mistakes of the past, we will relearn them the hard way .
But the current obsession with CO2 gas emissions and the fear that they will cause a world wide climate disaster are misplaced concerns that are doing far more harm than good to the world because these unjustified fears have given rise to massive and irrational misallocation of the world scare resources and capitol that could have been used to solve much more serious and pressing problems faced by the world community.
Just sayin'...
Like almost all Republicans she has left AGW open to the benefit of the doubt. I question the intelligence of anyone who thinks man is affecting the climate.
I watched her on the show this morning. She was very coherent and clear in her replies to Snarky Wallace. She seems to be well coached, intelligent and up to speed on most issues.
Not presidential material, but I can definitely see her playing a role as a Cabinet Scty. in a Trump or Cruz admin.