Skip to comments.
Investigators search for motive in Planned Parenthood shooting that left three dead
Washington Post ^
| 11/28/15
| Petter Holley
Posted on 11/28/2015 9:47:19 AM PST by Timpanagos1
The day after a gunman stormed a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado Springs, investigators were working to determine what prompted the shooting that resulted in the death of three people, including a police officer.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: colorado; robertdear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: Timpanagos1
Maybe there isn’t a motive. Maybe he’s just nuts.
2
posted on
11/28/2015 9:48:46 AM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(Win or Lose, Still a "12"!)
To: Timpanagos1
Without reason of motive now likely means that motive is not as clear cut as mass media was attempting to push yesterday.
To: Timpanagos1
Was he in the Bank first or not?
4
posted on
11/28/2015 9:49:15 AM PST
by
Paladin2
(my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
To: Timpanagos1
The idiot was a registered democrat that identified as a woman. Liberal, therefore insane.
5
posted on
11/28/2015 9:49:54 AM PST
by
CodeToad
(Stupid kills, but not nearly enough!)
To: Timpanagos1
Ask Brian Ross he’ll tell you he’s Christian Republican TEA partier and NRA chapter leader. No problem. Next question.
6
posted on
11/28/2015 9:50:11 AM PST
by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
To: Timpanagos1
7
posted on
11/28/2015 9:51:02 AM PST
by
Eddie01
To: Paladin2
Was he in the Bank first or not?My thought also. Was it a failed bank robbery?
Media narrative would never allow that it was a failed bank robbery.
To: Timpanagos1
So a killing occurs at a place that does killings?
Maybe its karma.
9
posted on
11/28/2015 9:54:34 AM PST
by
PGR88
To: CodeToad
10
posted on
11/28/2015 9:54:40 AM PST
by
Don W
( When blacks riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: Don W
He might have been mad they didn’t treat him as a women, which is how he self identifies.
Amusing the leftists jumping on this as “Christian terrorism” and, like most serial killers, looks like this is a sexually confused nutcase.
To: Timpanagos1
If it comes from the WaPo, I can predict the motive they’ll report.
13
posted on
11/28/2015 9:56:47 AM PST
by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
Click The Pic To Donate
Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can
14
posted on
11/28/2015 10:03:11 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: Timpanagos1
His/her motive was probably just another loon walking around unsupervised who wanted to cash in his “15 minutes” and become a celebrity in the “media” before he crooked. Another one of the media’s wildly popular “lone wolves.”
15
posted on
11/28/2015 10:06:34 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Who is fact checking the state controlled, leftwing media's fact checkers?)
To: Timpanagos1
Apparently, he didn’t shoot anyone at PP except a guy who crawled in there to escape. Most of the others he shot were cops.
Maybe that was his plan. He didn’t think cops would shoot up PP to get him, and he was right.
16
posted on
11/28/2015 10:13:51 AM PST
by
VanShuyten
("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
To: Timpanagos1
Was anyone killed at pp? Or was he chased in there by a cop? I haven’t heard about the other deaths.
17
posted on
11/28/2015 10:16:06 AM PST
by
lucky american
(Progressives are attacking our rights and y'all will sit there and take it.)
To: Timpanagos1
Maybe he was upset that Obamacare would not cover free transgender surgery. Now he can get it in prison.
18
posted on
11/28/2015 10:16:39 AM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Timpanagos1
Headline is all wrong. It should read, investigators conducting focus groups to see what shooter motive will most help Democrats vilify Republicans and become a central talking point in future Presidential debates.
19
posted on
11/28/2015 10:19:22 AM PST
by
Robert357
(D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
To: smokingfrog
Maybe he was upset that Obamacare would not cover free transgender surgery. If I am not mistaken, I believe Obamacare does cover sex change surgery. It's necessary coverage, whether you want it or not. Meaning you're going to pay for it, whether you want it or not.
20
posted on
11/28/2015 10:24:44 AM PST
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: .IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson