Just What Did Obama Mean by it? (Excellent Commentary)

Townhall.com ^ | November 24, 2015 | D.W. Wilber

[JimRed]

A candidate calling for a massive overhaul should have resulted in at least the news media asking for a few more specifics.

1. It would have been racist to ask.
2. He is not a Republican, so, never mind.

[Kaslin]

Yes he should have been vetted in 2008, but the drive-by media wasn't interested in vetting him. All they were interested in making him the first "black" president of the United States.

I put the quotation marks on black, because he is a mulatto and not really black.

[Tax-chick]

I’m sure you could comprehend an 8th grader’s political essay, as well. However, that does not mean it’s up to a publication standard.

[TomGuy]

Progessives/Libs never seem to concern themselves with results, effects, unintended consequences, etc. They just do not look ahead to see what potential disasters their plans might bring about.

[Kaslin]

An 8^th grader's political essay my foot. No one besides you had any problem reading the column. Why is that?

[Tax-chick]

The ability to recognize correct grammar is more a curse than a virtue.

[euram]

Most people didn’t even listen to him. He said this about fundamentally transforming America numerous times, even just a couple days from the election. All most saw was that he was black, and that was enough for them.

[SpinnerWebb]

Ah. The one world government. And do they naively see themselves as the head of that government?

Fools.

They will be heads alright.

Heads on a pike, with no body still attached.

[shhrubbery!]

I put the quotation marks on black, because he is a mulatto and not really black.

Agree that he isn't really black, but not on the basis of proportion of genes -- rather that no one in his family background had anything in common with most American black people.

E.g., Obama is not a descendant of slaves. (But ironically he is a descendant of slave-owners -- from his white mother's side of the family.)

[LucyT]

Article and # 10 .

.

[Smokin' Joe]

Part of the whole Global Socialist/One World/New World Order crowd's utopia is that all have and are treated equally. From the days of Mandell House and the League of Nations, they have been working toward a global government, and in the minds of the modern Liberal Globalist, equality is achieved by making those who sat on high equally low to the average, without regard for the individuals involved. It keeps the world right where they want it, with entire populations in a constant state of ever changing victimhood, with neither equity nor equality, enslaved by the constantly changing missives of the State.

If a nation which is founded on Liberty and Justice for All is prominent in the world, then it makes the rest look bad, especially if it is prosperous.

Besides, these people fancy themselves immune to the penance they would impose on lesser beings for their own sins and envision themselves as an elite class who will not have to (and don't) live by the rules they would impose.

[Vinnie]

After he leaves office the MSM is going to tell us all the stuff they knew or have gathered over the years.

It’s their way of clearing their collective consciences. Sort of a confessional moment, and they expect to be absolved.