Posted on 11/23/2015 3:38:08 AM PST by markomalley
Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban has again hit out at Europe’s policy of mass migration, linking the latest terrorist atrocities in Paris to the European Union’s (EU) long standing immigration policies, and insisting that “all the terrorists are basically migrants… The question is when they migrated to the European Union”.
Speaking in an interview with POLITICO Europe, Mr. Orban – who has been the most fervent defender of the Judeo-Christian West during the ongoing migrant crisis – said that the “number one job” for European policy makers since the Paris attacks is “to defend the borders and to control who is coming in.”
He said it was “logical” that Europe’s enemies – radical Islamists – would send terrorists in with the migrant wave.
“All of them present a security threat because we don’t know who they are. If you allow thousands or millions of unidentified persons into your house, the risk of … terrorism will significantly increase.”
Mr. Orban has previously lashed out against pro-migration activists and groups, specifically taking aim at his fellow countryman George Soros, a billionaire whose Open Society Foundations finance almost every large pro-migration think tank and pressure group in the Western world.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
But I don't agree with him that all terrorists are migrants. I look at many examples in the past: Baader-Meinhof (later RAF), Red Brigades, Action Directe, etc. They were home-grown (with Soviet money and intel backing them).
The point being that if the left is overthrown in Europe, they will see their own home-grown terrorists spring up again. Right now, it's primarily foreign Muslim invasion...but it can change in an instant.
“to defend the borders and to control who is coming in.â€
Quote of the year!
The pressure from Russia (and I’m not faulting it) is going to force a lot of terrorists to simply move their efforts to Europe where they can’t be bombed and the targets are defenseless.
Whenever newcomers are added to a population, it's important that they become part of the prevailing value system, and accept their new country as their own. In Europe and the US there are large populations that have not adapted to their homelands. They never will if more members of their ethnic groups keep arriving from their homelands.
That's why the EU should not be taking in more Muslims, why the US should not be taking in more Hispanics, Africans, or Muslims. The influx has stopped the process of adaptation.
Look at early colonization in MA. The Indians were okay with the original Mayflower survivors, who depended on them for survival. But when more boats arrived.....things changed forever.
“But I don’t agree with him that all terrorists are migrants.”
Agreed. If he was to be much more accurate he would have said all Muzzies are terrorists since jihad via terrorism is the core tenant of Islam.
The infidel migrants are okay as long as they are vetted before being allowed in to the country they are immigrating to.
Let’s see...IRA terrorists? The Celts have been in the British Isles for several thousand years. The Basque separatists? The Basques have been where they are for a very long time, probably longer than anyone else in Europe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.