Obama Administration Assures Governors Refugee Vetting Is Rigorous
Posted on 11/22/2015 1:25:59 PM PST by amorphous
Former CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson claimed that she has sources who say President Barack Obama has "closed his mind" to some intelligence reports with which he disagrees.
Wednesday on NewsmaxTV's "Steve Malzberg Show," Attkisson asserted that Obama "does not necessarily listen to the people with whom they disagrees. He seems to dig in. … He is facing formidable opposition on this particular point."
Attkisson explained, "I have talked to people who have worked in the Obama administration who firmly believe he’s made up his mind, I would say closed his mind, they say, to their intelligence that they've tried to bring him about various groups that he does not consider terrorists, even if they’re on the U.S. list of designated terrorists.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Hussein is an Extreme Errorist. His buddies are Jihadis, pure and simple.
That’s OK. I don’t listen to him either!
He does not seem able to differentiate between the Urban League and ISIS except he likes ISIS better as he sees them as more effective.
He only sees the ones with pictures and unicorns.
Some might take this as another indicator of mental illness.
What is it the 25th Amendment...yeah that is the one...
Are they editing the big words for him?
Why, it’s almost like Obama is being blackmailed.
It’s like he could be in real big trouble for going after the terrorists.
Libya.
It’s obvious Obama is deep in bed with these Jihadis. My question is why are our agencies, who are ALL sworn to defend America, putting up with it?!
Obama is a Jihadist!
Thank you for referencing that article amorphous. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.
The main problem here is not lawless Obama imo, but a corrupt Congress that refuses to impeach and remove him from office. Constitution-ignoring incumbent lawmakers are probably happy that last-term Obama is doing their dirty work for them so that they can be relected next year.
That being said, please consider the following. If patriots elect Trump president they need to support Trump with a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that is not only willing to work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, but is also willing to propose new amendments to the Constitution to the states for specific new powers, if necessary, to support Trumps vision for the nation.
An added bonus with such a Congress is that it will probably be willing to impeach and remove corrupt, state sovereignty-ignoring, activist justices from the bench.
I agree with most of your comments. But I have to wonder why they are ALL complicit. It makes me wonder if there is a bigger issue at play here.
My theory is that our State of the Union is much worse than these guys are letting on. My theory is they are paralyzed not by philiosophical ideals, but by understanding that our military and economy would not survive long if we did much of anything.
They know it and they are horrified by it.
Recently (it may have been during the speech he made in Turkey) I am certain I heard Obama say that he “meets with his security advisers every couple of weeks.” I haven’t heard anybody mention this however. Why isn’t anyone questioning the fact that he meets with them so infrequently? Did anyone else hear this? If so, does anyone have the exact quote, or a clip of these remarks?
Looking at picture because he can’t read big words. Three letters tops.
Perhaps, But he totally ignores them in favor of Iranian born Valerie Jarrett.
One big reason that corrupt lawmakers get themselves elected to DC is to fill their pockets with their ”fair share” of the tunsami of illegal federal taxes going through DC; it beats robbing banks for a living.
That being said, given the remote possibilty that you have not seen the following excerpts, you might find them interesting. First, a previous generation of state-sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that Congress is prohibited from taxing and spending in the name of state power issues, essentially any issue which Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers.
”Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” - Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Note that since there is nothing in Section 8 that expressly authorizes Congress to tax and spend for things like Social Security or Obamacare, such federal programs are based on 10th Amendment protected-state powers and associated state revenues which the corrupt feds have stolen from the states.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” - Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
At this point in the presidential race, I think that Trump has distinguished himself as the ball of fire that can help patriots put corrupt Congress back into its Section 8-limited power ”cage.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.