To: markomalley
Yuck. I’m sorry I read the article.
2 posted on
11/19/2015 1:55:22 PM PST by
sparklite2
(Islam = all bathwater, no baby.)
To: markomalley
He put the dog out of its misery, since no owner could be found to do that - rabies.
To: markomalley
âUnfortunately, at some point after the dog was contained, one of our officers used a knife and cut the dogâs throat,â said Baltimore police deputy commissioner Dean Palmere, according to WBAL. âThis is outrageous and unacceptable breach of our protocol,â he said.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3169684/posts (June 19, 2014)
4 posted on
11/19/2015 2:51:29 PM PST by
Ken H
To: markomalley
If rabies was an issue, animal suffering is far less important than the avoidance of non-bite communication of the virus. Cutting a dog’s throat is just an asinine thing to do except in laboratory conditions. Shooting for the heart is probably best and safest, and even then from some feet away.
5 posted on
11/19/2015 2:51:55 PM PST by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
To: markomalley
Interesting that the officer chose a judge rather than a jury.
9 posted on
11/19/2015 3:11:45 PM PST by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: markomalley; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; ...
#RabidDogsLivesMatter
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
10 posted on
11/20/2015 12:57:56 PM PST by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson