Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

“From 1924 to 1965 we didn’t have any immigration.”

That can’t be true. There all sorts of emigres who came here during that period fleeing this or that.


2 posted on 11/18/2015 2:44:28 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Borges

We had very very little.


4 posted on 11/18/2015 2:46:48 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
My great Grandfather became a citizen in 1925 or so but he got here in 1912, signed his letter of intent around 1917. He had to swear (To God) that he wasn't an anarchist, a polygamist or a believer in the practice of polygamy. The polygamy question seems to suggest a religious question.



It also happens to be at the time of the greatest influx of Middle Eastern Christians. (until about a century ago the Christian population of the middle east was about 40%)
6 posted on 11/18/2015 3:03:35 PM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

Rush is missing some years.

My grandparents came to the States in the 50’s. They fled from Europe on a ship. They had to have sponsors in order to enter the USA and my mom had received a scholarship to a Catholic College otherwise she wouldn’t have been allowed in.

How times have changed.


10 posted on 11/18/2015 3:21:08 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges; All
” ”From 1924 to 1965 we didn’t have any immigration.”

That can’t be true. There all sorts of emigres who came here during that period fleeing this or that. "

And there are possibly more problems with Mr. Limbaughs statement then he knows.

I am sorry to say that these days patriots need to check every action of the corrupt federal government against its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers. And in the case of so-called federal immigration laws, the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate immigration imo.

More specifically, regardless of PC interpretations of the Constitutions ”uniform Rule of Naturalization” Clause (1.8.4) used to justify federal immigration laws, and the slavery-related clause (1.9.1), Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, Madison generally regarded as the father of the Constitution, had clarified, in the context of state sovereignty nonetheless, that the Founding States had not delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate immigration.

Here is the relevant excerpt from Jeffersons writings.

” 4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that ”the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,” the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the - day of July, 1798, intituled ”An Act concerning aliens,” which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force [emphasis added].” Thomas Jefferson, Draft of the Kentucky Resolutions - October 1798.

Here is the related excerpt from Madison's writings from the Virginia Resolutions.

"That the General Assembly doth particularly protest against the palpable and alarming infractions of the Constitution, in the two late cases of the ”Alien and Sedition Acts" passed at the last session of Congress; the first of which exercises a power no where delegated to the federal government, ...

. . .

. . . the General Assembly doth solemenly appeal to the like dispositions of the other states, in confidence that they will concur with this commonwealth in declaring, as it does hereby declare, that the acts aforesaid, are unconstitutional; and that the necessary and proper measures will be taken by each, for co-operating with this state, in maintaining the Authorities, Rights, and Liberties, referred to the States respectively, or to the people [emphasis added]. ” James Madison, Draft of the Virginia Resolutions - December 1798.


19 posted on 11/18/2015 3:48:56 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

It is not entirely true at all:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Origins_Formula

History is awesome. But not all of it is worth repeating.


20 posted on 11/18/2015 3:59:21 PM PST by mad puppy (E PLURIBUS UNUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson