Of Course: Despite Paris Attack Obama Has No Plans to Re-Evaluate Syrian Refugee Policy

Townhall.com ^ | 11/16/2015 | Katie Pavlich

[Iron Munro]

America's president cannot permit a muslim JV squad to distract him from the more important fight against the world's greatest threat.

[Servant of the Cross]

"We're a compassionate nation and this is a tragic situation but I also have to be concerned as Chairman of Homeland Security about the safety of Americans in this country and the concern that I have and that the FBI testified to is that we don't really have the proper databases on these individuals to vet them passed and to assure we're not allowing terrorists to come into this country and until I have that assurance, I cannot support a program that could potentially bring jihadists into the United States," House Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul said a recent interview with Fox News. "We don't know who these people are and I think that's the bottom line here and until we know who they are, we cannot responsibly bring them into the United States."

IMPEACH OccupyWH for treason if they dare overrule the Homeland Security Chairman on this matter.

PAGING SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE RYAN. Please pick up the white phone in the lobby. The American People are on the line.

[Vinnie]

2007. “I am going to fundamentally change America” BHO

Is there any doubt what he meant?

[Servant of the Cross]

2007. "I am going to fundamentally change America" BHO ... Is there any doubt what he meant?

[Ancesthntr]

Any deaths are on his (pin)head.

Hillary needs to be RELENTLESSLY challenged to state her position on this issue. Either she’s for it (with all that such implies), or she publicly disagrees with Obama (and, given his very thin skin, that will doubtless provoke a reaction - possibly including letting the DOJ indict Cankles).

[I want the USA back]

No, because he really likes what his buddies did in Paris, and would like it to happen here.

[Servant of the Cross]

Hillary needs to be RELENTLESSLY challenged to state her position on this issue. Either she's for it (with all that such implies), or she publicly disagrees with Obama (and, given his very thin skin, that will doubtless provoke a reaction - possibly including letting the DOJ indict Cankles).

Democrats' PC Refusal to Name 'Radical Islam' Betrays a Deeper Weakness

[Ancesthntr]

Yeah, OUTSIDE of the Dem lovefests - there won’t be any questioning of the Evil Queen there, we know that.

[Nea Wood]

Obama assures that they will not be dangerous because they will be the most “vetted” immigrants in history.

Even if that were true...and I highly doubt that it is...why bring them in? Why take the chance? What do Americans get out of this? Yeah...you know...Americans...those people who are always the last to be considered in any matter? We get NOTHING out of it, we've made it clear we don't want these "refugees" here, and yet they're being forced on us.

[Nea Wood]

In Sweden they’ve been burning down the buildings that were slated to house the immigrants. Just saying....