Early KKK
Burka-niqab
Posted on 11/15/2015 5:35:57 PM PST by markomalley
A mother-of-four was abused while she shopped in Tesco because she was wearing a niqab.
Rahela Chowdhury, 32, from Burnley, was in her local store with all four children when the man approached her and shouted 'why can't I see your face?'
She was left frozen to the spot and has been so scared she has hardly left the house since the incident on October 3.
Her youngest child, who is only four, also started crying uncontrollably.
Her abuser, John McDougall, 50, from Earby in Lancashire, has now been ordered to pay victim compensation and carry out 200 hours community service.
Recalling the terrifying ordeal, Mrs Chowdhury said: 'He started abusing me, asking me why I was wearing the full veil.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Well, why are you wearing that stupid Niqab, beyotch?
Where is the American feminist movement– why are they not condemning the hijab, the burqa?
Where is the American feminist movement and
why are they not condemning the hijab, the burqa?
Now we know the callous Brit responsible for forcing the Muzzies (ROP) to defend themselves against dangerous unarmed French civilians.
As if we care what a muzzie thinks.
Go away.
and THAT should be a question from Ted to Hillary during the first presidential debate: “Hillary, as someone who purportedly has based her entire career on supporting women’s rights, why haven’t you called out Muslims on their treatment of women?”
I’m wondering why she was out and about without her overseer in the first place.
Perhaps he read about Moslem males wearing suicide vests disguising themselves under burkas and Niqabs, then blowing themselves up and killing infidels.
Once the “feminists” start getting their genitals mutilated, they might pay a little better attention.
Zackley!
He should have counter-sued claiming irreparable harm and
trauma from fear of the danger posed by veiled terrorists.
I think most people would agree that if a child of yours had done that (confronted and shouted at a blameless woman) you would firmly reprimand that child and require him to apologize to the woman.
Same, then, for an adult. It is aggressively rude behavior.
And to conflate this with ISIS murderers massacring people in Paris is imbecilic.
Because it was never about ‘equal rights’, but about having more people in the work place to bilk the taxpayers to fund ‘big guv’.
Early KKK
Burka-niqab
The question should be “Why are you where a shroud?”
No, being "abused" means being gang-raped by smelly thugs, then having your throat cut. Or being beaten because you dared poke your head outside your hovel without your master's permission. Or having your face burned with acid because you dared speak to an infidel instead of the 120-year-old goat-plugger you were married to at age eight.
If this hag was actually being abused, she would have been knocked to the floor and boot-stomped, then told to get her stinking a$$ and her jihadi brood out of the country.
THAT'S abuse.
I agree with you. Very rude.
At least she didn’t get raped, or worse.
Is English your first language?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.