Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/12/2015 4:08:22 PM PST by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: markomalley

More like Out One

2 posted on 11/12/2015 4:11:19 PM PST by DoughtyOne (I support President Pre-elect Donald J. Trump. Karl Rove, the GOPe, and Leftist's worst nightmare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I hope they push this before the election to make sure that a VERY conservative Republican wins the election!


3 posted on 11/12/2015 4:11:43 PM PST by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
As the GOP controls both the House and the Senate, it is expected that Congress will reject the bill.

LOL - They'll pass it so that they get the LGBT vote next year.

4 posted on 11/12/2015 4:12:20 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (I am going to get those guns out of peoples hands. - Hillary Clinton 10/05/2015)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Earnest asserted that the legislation would not infringe on “the religious liberty that we hold dear.” 


Tell that to kim davis, jailed for not approving gay marriage.


5 posted on 11/12/2015 4:12:30 PM PST by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
Known as the Equality Act, the bill would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964, extending protection to those in the LGBT community from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

Barry Goldwater was right. The Civil Rights act of 1964 is an infringement on the inherent right of association.

It is not the government's job to force their own brand of morality on everyone else.

9 posted on 11/12/2015 4:17:56 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

“I’ll have those faggots voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” - Barack Hussein Obama


10 posted on 11/12/2015 4:21:28 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

So the White House is saying that LGBT’s should have their own Act, because they’re not normal, and aren’t covered by the Bill of Rights and Constitution like the rest of us.


11 posted on 11/12/2015 4:24:35 PM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

They all need to crawl back in the closet, shut the door, lock and throw the key away.

Severely mentally disturbed and/or self chosen degenerate lifestyle.


12 posted on 11/12/2015 4:26:28 PM PST by maddog55 (America Rising a new Civil War needs to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I think I will wander randomly into the ladies’ room and claim I am bi-curious and simply checking out variations on plumbing....including human plumbing.


13 posted on 11/12/2015 4:28:30 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

He is pure evil.


14 posted on 11/12/2015 4:33:07 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
Are pedophiles going to get their very own civil rights law or should they just be included in the LGBT law?

It would only make sense they be included. Most of them are the same people.

15 posted on 11/12/2015 4:37:19 PM PST by Gritty (Merkel is doing what Bomber Harris and the Red Army couldn't...wiping Germany off the map-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Sodomy is not a civil right, you have a choice.


16 posted on 11/12/2015 4:38:50 PM PST by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Republicans: Where can we sign up to support this?


17 posted on 11/12/2015 4:39:11 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

20 posted on 11/12/2015 4:39:58 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Based on pass performance republicans in Washington are stupid enough and liberal enough to fall for this.


22 posted on 11/12/2015 5:07:13 PM PST by Iron Munro (<p> The wise have stores of choice food and oil but a foolish man devours all he has. Proverbs 21:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I would imagine this will pass with huge Republican support too.


24 posted on 11/12/2015 5:13:05 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley; All
As a reminder to patriots, please consider the following about so-called LGBT civil rights.

The only constitutionally enumerated protection relating to sex is voting rights, evidenced by the 19th Amendment. And since pro-LGBT agenda issues have nothing reasonably to do with voting rights, corrupt Congress and the lawless Obama administration have no express constitutional authority to promote vote-winning LGBT civil rights.

But we certainly cannot trust the post-17th Amendment ratification Senate to do its job to protect the states by killing constitutionally indefensible LGBT civil rights legislation.

28 posted on 11/12/2015 5:48:05 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

“health care service providers”

This would mean an IVF clinic would have to provide fertility treatments for a female - male transgender who still had a uterus.


30 posted on 11/12/2015 5:53:36 PM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I understand the strategy. This is not about getting the gay vote, which is a tiny minority that does not even register in the national population or the voting population. This is about introducing a wedge issue to polarize the electorate. With gay marriage off the table the single issue voters who voted in 2012 have no incentive to vote in 2016. This is about rekindling that segment and it’s a significant percentage of the population.


31 posted on 11/12/2015 6:06:54 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
...that would prohibit discrimination toward the LGBT clique.

Discrimination being anyone who says something like, "Well I don't thinks it's natural or healthy"......

32 posted on 11/13/2015 3:09:18 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson