[VinL]

Much better debate with the smaller group of candidates-- will be even better when it's down to 4.

[VinL]

There’s a graph at the site— perhaps someone could post it— Thanks.

[Charles Henrickson]

Despite complaining early and often about not getting enough speaking time, John Kasich ended up with the second-most airtime.

I sure hope Kasich gets demoted to the kiddie table by the next debate. What an annoying guy!

I'd rather have Christie or Huckabee up on the main stage than Kasich. They at least contribute some worthwhile points to the conversation.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

I missed the first part so I didn’t get to hear that much of Cruz. I thought Rubio got the most time. It is impossible to be 100% even. I thought they did a very good job overall.

BTW, the first debate was very good, too.

[HarleyLady27]

I loved it when Trump asked for someone to shut Snarly Carly up...that woman is a disgrace to ALL women and should be over on Hillary’s side...what a loser!!!

[Presbyterian Reporter]

Having watched the debate I would not have expected Cruz to have had the most minutes.

I would have put Kasich or Rubio with the most minutes.

[erod]

Kasich and FioRINO have to go! Actually the next debate should be top four or five, having all these candidates on the stage doesn’t make for a good debate, and there are some up there who don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of getting elected.

[ghost of stonewall jackson]

why was a no-shot loser like kasich given so much time?

i thought rubio and paul looked good

[skeeter]

They must only be counting the time allowed to each candidate when having a question specifically addressed to them. Kasich answered everyone else’s question, seemed like he was talking for half the time.

[Road Warrior ‘04]

They DID effort keeping Trump on the sidelines. Glad Cruz got more time. Bush, Kasich & Paul were a waste of time.

[Yaelle]

Before Atta put his Koran in his rental car, in the early days of September, 2001, I was one of a handful of indefatigable Condit researchers in the Chandra Levy disappearance (not yet a known murder, but all evidence pointed there).

I've always had a negative impression about Kasich from that research. He kept showing up in the snippets I found online as being into some weird stuff with Condit. I did a little sleuthing this morning now again because that man was ruin-your-big screen-annoying and arrogant last night.

I thought you all would find this interesting: a snippet from right here on FR a few days before our country was torn asunder by Osama bin Laden.

Remember that the Speaker of the House at the time was Denny Hastert, whom it has been now proven was a pedophile having sex with boys, and paying off someone to keep it quiet. None of that was known 16 years ago.

And Anne Marie Smith was a huge witness to the Condit Chandra affair, because she, a flight attendant, was sleeping with Condit at the same time, saw the long curly Chandra hairs in the home of Condit, etc.

Check it out:

To: Humidston You guys! This is from Aheadnews...I don't know if it's just salacious gossip or true, but oh my! read it & let me know what you think. Oh I hope it's not true.
9.06.01 UPDATE: In a stunning turn of events it is now leaking out through sources in California that Anne Marie Smith has a list of 3-5 names of the bisexual Congressman who would perform in sex parties that Gary Condit tried repeatedly to entice the flight attendant to go to. These parties cross party lines and may have included such big names as John Kasich and the House Speaker Himself. Mr. Kasich has dropped out of sight since the story broke and was the guest host on FOX News when every other program was discussing the Chandra Levy matter and he declined to comment. Strange for a man who had been such close friends with the California Representative not to defend him. Bisexual secrets are no stranger to Washington circles since Bill Kristol's homosexual lover Sandy Hume (Son of Brit on FOX News) committed suicide recently when it was learned that his affair with the pundit and a Republican member of Congress would become public.
 138 posted on 09/07/2001 7:45:09 PM PDT by okstatemom [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

To: okstatemom OMG!!! But then again, nothing about D.C. would shock or surprise me any more.
148 posted on 09/07/2001 11:45:35 PM PDT by Humidston [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

To: okstatemom I grew up in the district Denny Hastert serves and have a very strong sense that 1) he would not have been able to keep homosexuality a secret from his constituents, and 2) he never would have allowed himself to be named speaker with such a thing hanging over his head, acutely knowing how Gingrich and what's-his-name-that-never-actually-became-speaker were treated.

Your comments are so horrific that I have to consider that either you or whoever fed you this disinformation (suspicously sliming only Republicans) are up no good.

[Raebie]

Kasich would have been better off just keeping his trap shut.

[Don Corleone]

John Kasich ended up with the second-most airtime. Kasich spoke for 12 minutes, with almost 14 percent of the total speaking time.

And said nothing that you couldn't have heard at the Democrat debate.

[McGruff]

Who stole the most air time?

[bgill]

Thought Kasich had the most instead of second most. He interrupted so many, many times. What a bore.