Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Blessing in disguise. IMO, Cruz benefited by flying under the radar. He's on a steady rise, and ideally, will surge in January.

BUT, contrary to the article's conclusion that the Cruz blackout is not "ideological"; it most certainly is-- and the evidence is right there in the article's charts. The networks are freezing out the real threat to the Establishment.

I like Trump, but if he wins, the Establishment can negotiate with Trump. With Cruz, there's no negotiation.

1 posted on 11/10/2015 11:54:37 AM PST by VinL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: VinL

It’s good to see Cruz pulling away from children’s table set.
And you’re right, he may peak at the best time.


2 posted on 11/10/2015 11:56:42 AM PST by sparklite2 (All will become clear when it is too late to matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

I posted here 6 months ago that the MSM would try hard to freeze Cruz out. After that FOX debate, the only name not discussed at the wrap up was Cruz.


3 posted on 11/10/2015 11:58:25 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

I agree somewhat .. but my contention is that if Trump does win the nomination, it will be imperative that Cruz run with Trump. Why; because they are the “dynamic duo”.

Trump is the PUSH MAN (out front), and Cruz is the writer of the legislation that will stand up against any Supreme Court challenge.

Perfect!


4 posted on 11/10/2015 12:02:42 PM PST by CyberAnt ("The fields are white unto Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

Good article by the mainstream media (for once). I wonder how badly the WaPo is at covering Cruz in terms of print space.

This article though doesn’t cover the amount of bias in coverage. Carson has been treated horribly as most people know by now. And Cruz had a big hit piece by the NYT recently, which Rush debunked today.

Anyway, go Cruz!


5 posted on 11/10/2015 12:03:17 PM PST by LovedSinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

Good point. Cruz does not want to surge to rapidly, because then his poll numbers will be harder to maintain, and then if they fall even a bit, stories will come about him peaking and so on. This has happened somewhat to Trump recently.

Cruz surging in January right before the Feb 1 Iowa caucus sounds great to me!


6 posted on 11/10/2015 12:05:47 PM PST by LovedSinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

I have hit FOX very hard on this issue of not mentioning the name of Ted Cruz .. even when he moved into 3rd place. And, now again, FOX is showing Rubio ahead of Cruz .. and I’m just not buying it.

FOX is playing a very, very dangerous game. If they aren’t careful, they will come off in the same category with POLITICO .. in the toilet on credibility.


7 posted on 11/10/2015 12:09:56 PM PST by CyberAnt ("The fields are white unto Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

Contrast with dozens of FReepers whining that Cruz wasn’t doing enough...was not polling high enough, had no chance. They’re still here and clinging to those ideas.


9 posted on 11/10/2015 12:36:25 PM PST by subterfuge (TED CRUZ FOR POTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson