Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

I continue to be amazed at the lack of reporting on any chemical analysis of the aircraft wreckage to support the bomb theory. I thought this was Standard Operating Procedure.

All the evidence I see is circumstantial. Where is the real physical evidence of a bomb?

And: If it was a missile launched by ISIS is there any chance that it could have been an American missile?

Did we leave that sort of weaponry in Iraq?

Would we help cover it up if we did?

Did I just miss the reports?
Anyone else think all of this is suspicious?


9 posted on 11/09/2015 8:21:03 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint
I agree. Until bomb residue is discovered in the wreckage, structural failure must still be considered. I guess it doesn't take much of an explosion to peel open an aircraft, but..

Perhaps new bomb technology where there's no residue? Hmmm..

15 posted on 11/09/2015 8:42:42 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint
I noticed that the interior of the rear cargo door is badly pitted with pock marks. Could be ball bearings from a bomb:


28 posted on 11/09/2015 10:00:57 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson