Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

Art for art’s sake is a relatively new thing. We can argue about that of course but building huge structures requires a purpose - ceremonial or practical is what I was getting at.


35 posted on 10/28/2015 11:52:41 AM PDT by Trumpinator (You are all fired!!! TRUMP! TRUMP! TRUMP! TRUMP! TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Trumpinator
Art for art’s sake is a relatively new thing.

...except maybe for all those ancient cave paintings. Are they art? Are they invocations to assist with a hunt? A recording of events? At 40,000 years old, they're pretty sophisticated.

37 posted on 10/28/2015 11:58:24 AM PDT by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Trumpinator

“We can argue about that of course but building huge structures requires a purpose - ceremonial or practical is what I was getting at”

There’s often little difference between saying something has a “ceremonial” purpose, and no purpose at all though. For example, the Colossus of Rhodes. It was dedicated to the “sun god”, so you could say it had a “ceremonial purpose”, but it wasn’t a temple, so there were no ceremonies performed there or anything like that. It was just, for all intents and purposes, a giant piece of public art, like our statue of Liberty.


38 posted on 10/28/2015 12:01:17 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson