Posted on 10/28/2015 9:54:02 AM PDT by TigerClaws
Research has shown that probabilities derived from betting markets are more accurate than polls at predicting political outcomes. For the purpose of convenience, this site lists estimated probabilities of each candidate winning a major party nomination, the general election, and the general election conditional on winning a major party nomination. It uses data from Betfair to perform the estimation.
(Excerpt) Read more at primary.guide ...
Thought it was interesting where the betting crowd is putting money.
Rubio. He seems to be the back up after Jeb went nowhere. Another big amnesty guy.
Interestingly, that site is favoring the Democrats to hold the White House in 2016. If true, that would be the first time since FDR/Truman that the Dems have held the office for more than eight years.
I wonder how much of that comes from wishful thinking by liberals who don’t have children and thus can afford to gamble on fantasy and how much is confidence in the democrat machine’s fraud talents.
It is entirely possible that some of the candidates, particularly Hillary, have flooded that site with her supporters. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if that was the case.
And we know that the illegals will be voting illegally in at least California. Of course California is already gone in the Electoral College so it doesn't matter if a billion illegal Democrat votes are added in there.
More illegals bet than do citizens?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.