Benghazigate was about a crony lobbyist persuading Hillary to bring about violent regime change in Libya (the murder of a POW named Gaddafi was a war crime for which Hillary boasted WE came WE saw HE DIED!!!).
And so Colbert asks her about birthdays and banks.
That culture of corruption that voters were supposedly upset about in 2006? Yeah, they don’t give a damn these days.
Liberal Democrat corruption is not NEARLY as corrosive as “moderate” Republican corruption. < /sarcasm >
That was a fine job of disinformation and misdirection in 2006, and now, by acceptance, it is presumed that ONLY Republicans practice crony deals that are “bad” for that territory once known as “the United States of America”, while Democrats confine their cronyism only to deals that are “good” for the designated territory (or the Power Couples far up in the hierarchy).
The Donald has been in the process of demolishing that concept. And for his performance so far, he has been widely applauded by not only perceptive folks of conservative persuasion, but by a lot of people who have been only spectators and non-participants in the political process for years.
It was all staged--her terms for making an appearance were hammered out beforehand---that she NOT be asked questions about the really bad stuff like her Benghazi incompetence and the Clinton Foundation fraud.