Once again, proud to say I did not vote for Willard.
Crazieman ain't that crazy.
Amen, me neither. Voting for Romney would have been as nuts as voting for Obama (see my tagline). I voted for a plurality -- I voted third party to do what I could to make sure that whichever leftist/statist won, Romney or Obama, would do so with as little support as possible.
A president elected by a majority of voters has strength and power in popular support. A president elected by a plurality (less than 50%) is weak because the majority of voters have said loud and clear, "you stink."
In spite of the myth the MSM spins to this day that Bill Clinton was "popular," clearly the MSM tells a falsehood because both times Clinton was elected, a clear majority rejected him in the voting booth. Perot did conservatives a favor -- Clinton was so vulnerable that he was slammed by the Republican Revolution and then impeached.
If Clinton had ever had a majority of voters behind him, that would probably never have happened.
Which is why in 2012, I voted for a plurality. I will only vote for that which I am willing to be held accountable. Had that leftist weasel amoral nightmare Romney won, every single person here who voted for him would be to blame for the Republican party turning hard left because they voted for that to happen no matter how much they intended to vote "against" Obama.