However, I do not agree 100% with what he says.
Saddam needed to have his head served to his sons on a platter, and same with the Libyan tyrant.
Blow up an airliner, die. Simple, really.
Harbor terrorists and declare 25 mil for reward for terrorism? Die. No mess, no fuss, step right up.
Our tar baby was when Prez Bush decided we could "tame" them into a democracy.
.Should have blown them up real good, then left, leaving a card that if you wish some more of this, speak up.
When Trump is prez, he will see the light (one can only hope). They all do. The question is what will they do with it?
Yeah, I agree, but the problem is as this gentleman here has stated how General Colon Pole stated that you break it, you own it.
We broke it, and we own it.
And now our country has gone full retard for invading marauding muslims all over everywhere, and Holy Crap what a mess.
They deserved to die, sure, but what are they replaced with? During the cold war, we supported all kinds of evil tin pot dictators (Saddam included)because the alternatives were severely damaging to global stability. There is no “good” in the middle east, just sh*tty and sh*ttier...
Qaddafi made a deal with Bush and Blair and the rest of Europe - he disavowed WMD and compensated for the Lockerbie terrorism. It is clear he wanted to transition in his final years to rule of his son who was Oxford educated and westernized.