Posted on 10/25/2015 8:13:37 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
Lord Nelson is spinning in his grave.
What a flustercluck.
Squandered investments in outmoded capital ships that can never survive the attack of flocks of seagull drones. Less than 150 cm drones each packed with 1kg of C4 plastique, brought to target by submarine launched cruise missiles 1,000 miles from target and directed to target by satellite. Those big ships can’t be defended and are death traps for their crews.
Sir Joseph.
Now landsmen all, whoever you may be,
If you want to rise to the top of the tree,
If your soul isn’t fettered to an office stool,
Be careful to be guided by this golden rule.
Chorus.
Be careful to be guided by this golden rule.
Sir Joseph.
Stick close to your desks and never go to sea,
And you all may be rulers of the Queen’s Navee!
“Patience” is also very funny.
“When I was a lad, I served a term
“As office boy to an attorneys’ firm...
Proving once again that truth is always stranger than fiction.
Whoever designed that British carrier must have started out designing Chinese junks. All it needs are battened sails and a dragon motif.
I was just going to write the same thing. They'll be able to land a heck of a lot of helicopters on those things because they'll never get delivery of the jets.
You had me at Spithead.
... but the two carriers are good payoff to the Scottish (and other UK) shipbuilder unions...
Who needs planes? The pilots and crew aren’t in unions...:^)
Better an RAF pilot who has never commanded a ship than a RN captain who knows nothing about aircraft. Look up the sinking of the carrier HMS Glorious and the incredible stupidity of its last captain, Guy D’Oyly-Hughes. He wouldn’t let all its boilers be let and ready to produce steam, or let its pilots fly local reconnaissance missions, or even post lookouts, in broad daylight in waters known to have German surface warships.
I’ve just finished reading several books on the WWII war in the Pacific. It was stated that a Captain of a carrier could not be given the command unless he was a pilot who had served as leader of an Air Wing. It seemed like a good rule then. I agree, though, that serving as a commander of a ship would also be appropriate.
Putting an airman in charge is about the same thing....the F-35.
The ships are not even tested yet, but are already undergoing modifications required by one thing....the F-35B vs F-35C.
No, they will not have enough F-35's to equip their squadrons, but the new plan is....bring in the Marines.
Yup, the US ByGod Marines will base squadrons of F-35B's on UK carriers.
>>>that should go nicely with the planes they don’t have to launch from them either<<<
They’ll end up buying Migs.
So? We have a woman who has never flown an airplane in charge of the Pacific Air Forces.
I don’t see the problem having a pilot in charge of a chip.
Never mind the lesbians and queers we have leading the DoD.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.