Posted on 10/16/2015 5:16:41 AM PDT by markomalley
“...sex was not consensual.”
___
Might be the only way she’s going to have it.
“ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! LOOK AT ME!!! LOOK AT ME!!!”
“I would be hard-pressed to conceive that any sexual act with this womyn could in any way, manner, or form EVER be considered consensual.”
Maybe she;
has a great personality,
is a good cook,
all the girls love her,
has her own car,
or has money.
No, even with all that I think I’d pass...
Being a Liberal means always having to say that you’re sorry.
This has nothing whatsoever to do with she-male and her experience.
This is an attempt to advance the narrative that if you have sex with someone and then later feel regret you can call it rape. Always ask yourself with these people “what is the end game”? The end game here is to teach promiscuous young women that even if they willingly engage in sex that later if they decide to change their mind they can call it rape.
Understand this; traditional marriage is the absolute bedrock of our society. Marriage is a picture of Christ and His Bridegroom. That is the target in all of these modern attacks on the traditional family and heterosexuality.
God send this Nation a revival, a Great Awakening. Short of that we are doomed for destruction.
National revival starts with personal revival. Seek the Lord Jesus Christ today.
>>I had sex with someone
No, Sex is the genetic exchange between Male and Female that was selected by Nature because it increases fitness of species.
What she and her Fellow reprobate perverts (at Oxford and elsewhere) do is something else.
>>I guess Oxford and other universities are no longer what they used to be!
Oh, it is what it’s always been. Just another Jesuit Ba’alshyte machine.
Do a little research on Cecil Rhodes and his queer antics.
I wish I could remember who posted this a long time ago, but it pretty much describes it.
“Partner assisted masturbation”.
I know this a futile attempt to get to the truth, but what is “full consent?” Isn’t consent a binary issue, making the “full” redundant, if not completely unnecessary?
Nobody ever got raped in an upper bunk.
They want to enable any woman (but ONLY women) to retroactively withdraw consent, and destroy the life of any man who displeases her. In this case, it was a dyke who got the treatment, but the primary target is men.
Lesbians date rape girls all the time. Drugs and alcohol are their friend to lowering inhibitions to same sex experiences.
Whether it is in roller derby, feminist encounter sessions, or sorority/college life.
It’s not surprising that homosexual reprobates (is that redundant?) are never able to tell the class exactly how their perversions have EVER increased the fitness of a culture that became infested with them.
If it was so “natural”, as they claim, we’d see natural benefits from their perversions - but we don’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.