People were against him because of his gun control stance and approval of civil unions for gays.
WELL, obammuer is about to pass executive action on guns and gays are allowed to get married!!!
Rudy would NOT have:
colored the white house in rainbow, traded five terrorists for a traitor, took all the troops out of Iraq.
He would have armed anyone fighting the Muslim Brotherhood or Al Qaeda,
With the weapons he would have given the Kurds, they would be mostly gone by now.
Russia and China would have known not to @#$ around with him.
He wasn’t a RINO. He was a very patriotic American who
would have saved us from this nightmare.
Oh well.
He wouldn’t have gone after guns. In NYC you have to concede a few things to get elected. It’s called being realistic.
He had TEN TIMES the chance of beating obummer than McCain!! What a shame.
Agree with what you are saying about Rudy. While socially liberal, he is patriotic and pro-American.
As for “Wilhelm DeBlasio” - as someone who is partially of German ancestry, we don’t want to claim him either! Would rather point to someone of German background who has done more for the city than most of the politicians - Donald Trump!
Yeah, New York wouldn’t elect someone who campaigned on being pro-life, pro-gun and anti-homosexual. I think those were far from his core beliefs that he would want to push on the country. He’s a New York Republican in the same mold as Trump, who’s successfully flip-flopped on those issues for the national election. Rudy would’ve been a far better candidate than McCain or Romney and probably more conservative than either. He might make an interesting V.P. choice for Trump too. Rudy has spoken very well of Trump on Fox News.