Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C. Edmund Wright
I don’t think Donald is attacking Democrats particularly and certainly only a few areas of institutionalized liberalism. I am not sure how you would reach that conclusion.
Excuse me, when you said, “institutional liberalism” I heard, “Establishment journalism.
The analogy to Newt and Donald is the fighting spirit, the fighting tone....
Yes - but you defeat the MSM, you defeat the libs - they are joined at the hip.

They are joined at the hip, in the sense that “liberalism” is best defined as “the policy implications of the proposition that

"It is the critic who counts; people who work to a bottom line and expect credit for accomplishment are suckers."

18 posted on 10/12/2015 2:12:57 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Yes - but you defeat the MSM, you defeat the libs - they are joined at the hip.

They are, along with academia nuts, radical judges, union thugs, etc. Newt could weave all of those into a single debate answer. No one else really can. My problem with DT is that he agrees with that cabal on several issues......including his support today for BERNIE SANDERS on trade.

19 posted on 10/12/2015 2:40:27 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again (Amazon Best Seller))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson