Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Threatens The U.S., Says Will "Not Tolerate Violations Of Its Territorial Waters"
Zero Hedge ^ | 9 Oct 2015 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 10/09/2015 9:33:37 AM PDT by amorphous

While the geopolitical posturing between the US and China over the South China Seas is nothing new, the latest and most dramatic installment started just one month ago, when as part of its celebration to commemorate the successful victory over Japan in World War II, China sailed five warships to the Bering Sea, off the coast of Alaska, just as Obama was quite literally taking selfies of himself a few hundred miles away.

...

China's response was quick, clear and unequivocal:

"We will never allow any country to violate China's territorial waters and airspace in the Spratly Islands, in the name of protecting freedom of navigation and overflight," Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a regular news briefing.

"We urge the related parties not to take any provocative actions, and genuinely take a responsible stance on regional peace and stability," Hua said in response to a question about possible U.S. patrols.

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; beringsea; brazil; brics; china; huachunying; india; japan; russia; southafrica; southchinasea; tylerdurden; tylerdurdenmyass; whitehouse; zerohedge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 10/09/2015 9:33:37 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: amorphous

America shouldn’t tolerate Chinese goods in its ports.


2 posted on 10/09/2015 9:34:30 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

I think this is a tricky situation but don’t know enough to give any kind of opinion.


3 posted on 10/09/2015 9:35:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
"LIV, I don't give a damn."
4 posted on 10/09/2015 9:36:41 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

For the next year and a half (at least) the US can be had. Over and over.

Its gonna be a bumpy ride.


5 posted on 10/09/2015 9:38:14 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
I guess Obama the Destroyer will not be satisfied until China and Russia marches up Pennsylvania Avenue.
6 posted on 10/09/2015 9:39:09 AM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

The Chinese tried, very early on, even before the 9/11 crisis, to roll President George W. Bush.

On April 1, 2001, the Hainan Island incident occurred when a mid-air collision between a United States Navy EP-3E ARIES II signals intelligence aircraft and a People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) J-8II interceptor fighter jet resulted in an international dispute between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China.

The EP-3 was operating about 70 miles (110 km) away from the PRC island province of Hainan, and about 100 miles (160 km) away from the Chinese military installation in the Paracel Islands, when it was intercepted by two J-8 fighters. A collision between the EP-3 and one of the J-8s caused the death of a PRC pilot, and the EP-3 was forced to make an emergency landing on Hainan. The 24 crew members were detained and interrogated by the Chinese authorities until a statement was delivered by United States government regarding the incident. The exact phrasing of this document was intentionally ambiguous and allowed both countries to save face while defusing a potentially volatile situation between militarily strong regional states.

Reposition to 2015. Would the Current Occupant make the least move to assert the right of free passage across international waters of the South China Sea? Or will he cave in to the bogus assertion that dredging sea floor to build an artificial island on existing coral reefs, and occupying the new landform, constitutes an extension of Chinese territorial rights?


7 posted on 10/09/2015 9:42:37 AM PDT by alloysteel (Do not argue with trolls. That means they win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Send in the food stamp frigates!

Deploy the Social Security Disability destroyers!


8 posted on 10/09/2015 9:43:50 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Hi yankee....hahah....You no worry...You go shop for Chinese trinket and yum yum doggy treat. You get get get good China deal. Yankee be happy proud!!..Haha...Bye bye yankee!

9 posted on 10/09/2015 9:44:58 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
Chinese have no sense of humor. I'd take them seriously.
10 posted on 10/09/2015 9:49:00 AM PDT by McGruff (Trump-Cruz 2016. Make America Great Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

If some country wants to take a bite out of America’s dominance, now’s the time.


11 posted on 10/09/2015 9:49:53 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Luckily, Obama’s Navy — smaller than what we had in 1917 — will win the day. /S


12 posted on 10/09/2015 9:50:41 AM PDT by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

This not Syria is where world war 3 will start. Chinese public opinion is unanimous that these reefs belong to China for historical reasons.

Neither side can back down.


13 posted on 10/09/2015 9:54:03 AM PDT by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Luckily for us the Executive anus can take the pounding.


14 posted on 10/09/2015 9:54:17 AM PDT by Autonomous User (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Obama: Okay, Boss.....................


15 posted on 10/09/2015 9:56:43 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
We need a bomb graphic, similar to the prophet Muhammad one, showing Russia as the casing, China as the explosive, and Iran as the fuse, sitting on top of Obama’s head!
16 posted on 10/09/2015 9:58:39 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Wait until they build an new island 13 miles off the coast of Los Angeles.


17 posted on 10/09/2015 9:58:55 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Don’t give ‘em ideas...


18 posted on 10/09/2015 10:00:01 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

The Chinese tried, very early on, even before the 9/11 crisis, to roll President George W. Bush.

On April 1, 2001, the Hainan Island incident occurred when a mid-air collision between a United States Navy EP-3E ARIES II signals intelligence aircraft and a People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) J-8II interceptor fighter jet resulted in an international dispute between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China.

The EP-3 was operating about 70 miles (110 km) away from the PRC island province of Hainan, and about 100 miles (160 km) away from the Chinese military installation in the Paracel Islands, when it was intercepted by two J-8 fighters. A collision between the EP-3 and one of the J-8s caused the death of a PRC pilot, and the EP-3 was forced to make an emergency landing on Hainan. The 24 crew members were detained and interrogated by the Chinese authorities until a statement was delivered by United States government regarding the incident. The exact phrasing of this document was intentionally ambiguous and allowed both countries to save face while defusing a potentially volatile situation between militarily strong regional states.

Reposition to 2015. Would the Current Occupant make the least move to assert the right of free passage across international waters of the South China Sea? Or will he cave in to the bogus assertion that dredging sea floor to build an artificial island on existing coral reefs, and occupying the new landform, constitutes an extension of Chinese territorial rights?


19 posted on 10/09/2015 10:00:39 AM PDT by alloysteel (Do not argue with trolls. That means they win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Oops. Sorry for second post...


20 posted on 10/09/2015 10:02:40 AM PDT by alloysteel (Do not argue with trolls. That means they win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson