That would be a real test of the motives of the anti-gun people. Require that the records be destroyed once the applicant passes the check. If they insist on keeping the records, then the motive is eventual confiscation plain and simple.
Good point - And I think everyone knows what the answer to that will be.
‘They won’t be able to ‘enforce’ #IBC’s without registration..’
That will be their excuse
They are supposed to destroy the records. I think Clinton/Reno were stretching it out a bit but stopped when it was discovered.
But as The 2nd Amendment Foundation pointed out, there is no penalty for not complying with the destruction of records rule.
They may already have their list.
Destroying paper records is a meaningless act, designed to gain your trust in government.
Destroying digital records; also a meaningless act designed to gain your trust in government.
All paper records of purchase are immediately turned into digital records; unless they are 35 to 40 years old, then it just takes a little more time.
All digital records have multiple backups, whether you know about them or not.
Just ask the HILDABEAST; YOU WILL GO TO JAIL, Her NOT SO MUCH.
The supporters of “Background Checks” have repeatedly shot down any legislation that allows for background checks without identification of the firearm and with privacy guarantees for the buyer and seller.
They want to move to registration, then piecemeal confiscation, over time.