Why is Obama committed to seeing him removed?
{”Why is Obama committed to seeing him removed?”}
Mark Levin advises that if Obama is for something, we should be against it. If he is against it, we should be for it.
Levin claims if you take that stance you will be correct 99.9% of the time.
Clearly, using that good advice, Assad should stay in power.
I have often wondered that myself. Sure, he's not a nice guy, and plays rough with his opposition. But he is managing one of the craziest areas on the planet. On one side he has Israel, on the other he has Saudi Arabia, and on a third side he's got Iraq with Iran not too far away. He's got Russian to the north, Turks, Kurds, and Shi'ite, and Sunni nutcases, Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, ISIS, Al-Quaida, and a whole bunch of palistinian-cockroaches. It doesn't look like a pleasant perch to be on top of.
Another Westernized, non-Islamic leader removed. Saddam, Ghadify, Assad - Nasty dudes, but not hardline Islamic guys. They suppressed the radical Islamists, so BO wants them to go.
“Why is Obama committed to seeing him removed?”
He crossed Odunga’s line in the sand to the laughter of the world. The petulant Man child will never forget the ridicule heaped on him.
BO thinks he is for Muslim self determination. what he should know is that everything the scum dripping perverts do is Koran and Imam determined.
That depends on how many regional dictators need to be unplugged to release the Hell of Islam?