How odd! Article doesn’t mention motive. Was it politics, police brutality, climate change, animal rights...?
As there are a lot of other news articles making it pretty clear what the shooter’s motives were, I don’t think the fact that it isn’t stated in every single article is some sort of cover up.
I know Americans are used to the media trying to play down Islamism as a motive in cases like this, but the Australian media - mostly - doesn’t do that, and hasn’t done that.
Their all-inclusive shaming frame - when used only against the Right - is 'extremist.' For the whole world's social internationalists this includes anyone from Rock-Ribbed Republican members of the Jaycees to the membership of the NRA.
That nasty, unconfiscated gun! Did they get its mug shot?