Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: naturalman1975

How odd! Article doesn’t mention motive. Was it politics, police brutality, climate change, animal rights...?


3 posted on 10/05/2015 9:31:10 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Eagles6

As there are a lot of other news articles making it pretty clear what the shooter’s motives were, I don’t think the fact that it isn’t stated in every single article is some sort of cover up.

I know Americans are used to the media trying to play down Islamism as a motive in cases like this, but the Australian media - mostly - doesn’t do that, and hasn’t done that.


5 posted on 10/05/2015 9:54:47 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Eagles6
Actually, I think they might have sewn in a "plausible" motive that fits a new, more 'inclusive' narrative, since Australia's own peculiar branch, like the rest of the tribe, is so daft about using words like 'terrorism,' especially of the Islamic kind.

Their all-inclusive shaming frame - when used only against the Right - is 'extremist.' For the whole world's social internationalists this includes anyone from Rock-Ribbed Republican members of the Jaycees to the membership of the NRA.

That nasty, unconfiscated gun! Did they get its mug shot?

8 posted on 10/06/2015 5:08:00 AM PDT by Prospero (Omnis caro fenum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson