To: Sam Gamgee
I think the concept was part of a deal where Iran would shut down its centrifuges and receive energy grade Uranium for a power plant. A plausible solution, if we weren't dealing with a lying, cheating, conniving, bunch of terrorists that don't have any intentions of building nuclear power plants.
The other portion of this that leaves questions is that this story is coming from a bats$&t crazy lady who happens to be in charge of Argentina.
15 posted on
10/05/2015 4:10:27 PM PDT by
USNBandit
(Sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: USNBandit
I think the concept was part of a deal where Iran would shut down its centrifuges and receive energy grade Uranium for a power plant. A plausible solution, if we weren't dealing with a lying, cheating, conniving, bunch of terrorists that don't have any intentions of building nuclear power plants That's all true. But to get the reactor fuel and submit to IAEA inspections would be fairly simple. Many countries have done it, including Turkey, Egypt, Morocco, Syria and a couple of African countries. There's a carrot of cheap fuel but the that gets taken away if the countries don't allow inspections. Now with Iran we have a mess, neither a satisfactory reactor fuel program nor an agreement that will preclude weapons.
28 posted on
10/05/2015 5:29:25 PM PDT by
palmer
(Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
To: USNBandit
Oh Okay, so these materials “could” be used peacefully? OK, so then Obama isn't pure evil, just extraordinarily stupid.
40 posted on
10/06/2015 1:23:24 PM PDT by
Sam Gamgee
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson