[chaosagent]

I’ll bet the child abuse charge is what did him in.
________________________________________________________

Note that according to the article, the ‘child abuse’ charge came about because the boyfriend he threatened was 17. No ‘sex’ involved.

[Forgotten Amendments]

Note that according to the article, the ‘child abuse’ charge came about because the boyfriend he threatened was 17. No ‘sex’ involved.

That's my point. They would leave themselves open to being accused of being soft on a "child abuser". Political poison.

So, they let this guy who PROTECTED his child rot in prison.

The prosecutor, cops, and Scott should be strung up.