Still waiting for "conservative" talk radio to get behind the only true conservative.
Me, too vinl
If you can’t get others to follow, it doesn’t accomplish much. It becomes a statement of personal faith or belief.
PRESIDENT Ted Cruz. (Has a very nice ring to it, eh?)
Oh, and 2DV, love your tagline.
.
Bingo!
I’ve had to turn off all “conservative” radio. Cannot even stomach Prager right now.
“Still waiting for “conservative” talk radio to get behind the only true conservative”
Plenty of time for that after Trump has absorbed the fury of the left. He’ll eat it up and spit it out, and Cruz will have escaped getting “Alinsky’d” for a bunch of months.
“...you’re looking for the Republican candidate who is the most steadfastly opposed to liberalism, whose agenda is oriented toward stopping it and thwarting it and defeating it, it is Ted Cruz.”
Puzzling thing for Rush to say, after telling us yesterday that the passage of the Corker bill’s was strictly about money. Cruz voted for the Corker bill (along with every Republican save one), but now attacks it viciously. It is amazing. He claims it is setting the stage for a catastrophe. No one will remind him that he voted for it, so I suppose he forgot how he voted.
I was just listening to Mark Levin; he mentioned how the Constitution was turned upside down by the Corker bill, the bill that made it all happen for Obama and Iran.
Cruz is supposed to be Mr. Constitution. I would prefer some Cruz supporter to post and explain to the world why Cruz voted for the Corker bill. Telling me that I am a horrible person for mentioning Cruz’s vote is not an explanation.
This sounds like Rush craftily endorsing Cruz, without saying it. It’s as close as Rush will get, this far out.
Mark Levin has been touting Cruz for some time now, but it’s early for these guys to commit.
I'm still waiting for conservative FR to get behind Cruz. It seems to be Trump, Trump, Trump.
I agree, hands down! There is Cruz and then there is everyone else. Cruz has made enemies of the Democrats and the establishment GOP, he is showing the way to drain the swamp, but too many are more vested in the horse race than the defeat of cronyism and liberalism.
“Rush emphatically affirms that Ted Cruz is the candidate most opposed to liberalism” ping ...
...damndest thing....without a doubt Cruz is more in line ideologically with Rush, Levin, Hannity, etc - you'd think this would be a slam dunk.
but...isnt the donnie the New New NEW voice of all conservatives everywhere?...
Government is a force -- it is ONLY a force, nothing more, nothing less, which George Washington warned is a "dangerous servant and a fearful master." In politics, we are talking about who we elect to wield that force.
Dear reader -- there two primary definitions of the word "conserve" in non-political application:
a) to keep something safe
b) to use something sparingly
In America today, there are THREE very different ideas of what being "politically conservative" is.
1. To us the force of government (no matter how much it takes, a lot or a little) to preserve and shelter America from change, to keep things the same -- to "conserve" American freedom. This type of conservative RESISTS CHANGE.
2. To use the force of government (no matter how much it takes, a lot or a little) to promote/enforce Christian values. Think "social conservatives" such as Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee. This mindset thinks that anyone who is anti-abortion is therefore "conservative," even if the same person may be all for nationalized health care, food stamps, and the minimum wage.
3. To use the force of government conservatively, as in sparingly.
A cook who is "conservative" with spice uses it sparingly; a politician who is "conservative" with government does the same. Just such a politician is Ted Cruz, and just such a politician was Ronald Reagan. Christians, both, with the faith and confidence that LESS government enables MORE people to live Christian lives.
I understand the total futility of resisting change. Change is a constant thing and when things stop changing is when we really have something to worry about. So for me, even trying to be "conservative" by the first definition is a fool's errand because change is going to happen and government has ZERO power to prevent it, thank GOD.
I understand the Founder's wisdom in creating a nation where government was designed to be used sparingly, that is -- CONSERVATIVELY.
God bless Cruz and lead him to victory.
The question or rather the statement should be.....
NONE OF US need anyone, including Rush Limbaugh to tell us who the most conservative candidate is, it comes from instincts.
It’s as if the word Conservativesm has become a bad word here amount some people.
They betray themselves with their own speech.