[EternalVigilance]

Very Romneyesque.

[EternalVigilance]

FYI...

[DuncanWaring]

The “Law of the Land” once also held that one man could own another as property.

[CivilWarBrewing]

So did Trump and others. Shows lack of understanding of SCOTUS’ limitations of their authority.

[GraceG]

So I guess Dredd Scott and Kuramatsu still is the law of the land too!

[Vigilanteman]

You owe an apology to Romney for the comparison. Even he wasn’t that dense. If Fiorina thinks we live in a dictatorship run by a committee of five judges, then there is no reason for a congress or a president.

[DiogenesLamp]

“I think the Supreme Court ruling will become the law of the land, and however much I may agree or disagree with it, I wouldn’t support an amendment to reserve it.

Good bye! No further consideration of you is warranted.

[Jim W N]

I don’t really care what Fiorina said. She’s not a trustworthy or worthwhile candidate for President. We need someone MUCH better than that.

Regarding the law of the land, a SCOTUS decision based on a good-faith effort to apply the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended, is certainly a valid interpretation of a federal law and thus certainly is part of the law of the land.

A SCOTUS decision, congressional legislation, or a Presidential act that is not authorized by the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended, is NOT the law of the land (ART VI, CL 2, U.S. Constitution).

[South40]

Fiorina Did Refer to SCOTUS Decision As “Law of the Land”

So did Trump. (tagline)

[txrefugee]

Fiorina said that Kim Davis was an elected official. and it was “her duty to obey the law of the land.” I’m sure this is on video because it was on Fox News when Davis was sent to jail for not issuing marriage licenses. Obviously, Fiorina isn’t ready for prime time and has opposing viewpoints on every issue.

[wagglebee]

Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[wagglebee]

Here is the "Law of the Land" that I am aware of:

Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

I don't see anything in there that says a person can "choose" to kill another person because they are inconvenient, the person's father is a criminal or any other reason.

[ManHunter]

Yet another adherent to the philosophy of “settled law” and, by extension, a denier of the separation of powers and the Constitution as the foundation of our laws.

[RiseUpPatriots]

i fail to see why we are getting so involved in this as Christians.

Our job is to accept Jesus and to spread his word. We can bring the word to man but cannot make him read it. It is not for us to judge them because we do know that they will be judged when it counts the most.

If it is an interpretation of law, then so be it. We cannot change this sin by committing more sins (judging, lying). All we do is hurt the credibility of the Word.

I am not saying that we need accept them but to just ignore them. They are committing an afront to God, but not to my faith in God for I know he will deal with them in due time.

[Carry_Okie]

“I think the Supreme Court ruling will become the law of the land, and however much I may agree or disagree with it, I wouldn’t support an amendment to reserve it."

Congress can take jurisdiction over marriage away from the Federal courts without a Constitutional amendment. It's one of those Tenth Amendment thingies.

[liberalh8ter]

I can't watch her...she reminds me so much of Pelosi and I see right through her. She lies, she says whatever is politically expedient. She speaks condescendingly; as though she is addressing a child who couldn't possibly have obtained a level of knowledge such as hers. Fingernails on a chalkboard. God help us if she gets the nod.